Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rudra john cena


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Rudra john cena
Final (0/3/0); ended 22:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW Jamesx12345 22:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 

Nomination
– Hello. I am a registered and  regular user of Wikipedia. I am here in Wikipedia for more than 2 years. I have nominated myself for adminstrator because I want to contribute more for Wikipedia. I have nominated numerous articles for Good Article in Wikipedia. I am also a mentor of new reviewers for Good articles. I have cooporated with many user in there new created articles. I think this qualities are enough for transforming into administrator. I will wait for the respectful decision done by other user. Thankyou. Rudra john cena (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: An adminstrator has the work to protect an article from vandalism, to block the user who are not respecting the rules and conditions mentioned by Wikipedia after repeated intimations, and if I become a administrator I will intend to work everything that a good admistrator intend to do. Rudra john cena (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: My best contributions include an article by me Hero Motocorp SuperSplendor which is under work. And I nominated many article for WP:GA. The nominated article include Arvind Kejriwal, Quasar and many more. Beside this I am a proffessional reviewer of nominated article, I am also a mentor for new reviewers. I have contributed because, I like the idea of online encyclopedia rather than studing with huge books.Rudra john cena (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: Yes, once I was in conflict. When I was new to wikipedia, I have started editing a page where I linked Disambugation pages. When I was notified by other user about this. I started myself to edit pages with greater concerntration.  In future I will deal any conflict such that it does not violates any terms and conditions. Rudra john cena (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

General comments
RfAs for this user: 
 * Links for Rudra john cenaRudra john cena:
 * Edit summary usage for Rudra john cenaRudra john cena can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) oppose Per WP:COMPETENCE.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 20:20, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose I'm afraid I have to agree with Maunus. While I'm willing to assume good faith, this editor's pattern of behaviour (and grasp of English) indicates he still has quite a way to go before he can contribute substantially to the English Wikipedia, let alone provide guidance to others therein. Shoebox 2   talk  22:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose I'm afraid 164 edits is extremely low for an RFA. Successful candidates for adminship tend to have more than 5000 edits at the very least. Jamesx12345 22:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.