Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SilverSoul91911


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

SilverSoul91911
'Final (0/5/0); ended 13:19, 8 April 2011 (UTC), closed per WP:NOTNOW by Alpha Quadrant''    talk

Nomination
– YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER SilverSoul91911 (talk) 12:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Reverting vandalism, deletions, clean-ups, etc.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I haven't that many articles but try to cleanup anything that needs to be.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I was in an edit war once. Bad idea. I stopped what I was doing and tried to discuss it with the other person.

General comments

 * Links for SilverSoul91911:
 * Edit summary usage for SilverSoul91911 can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.''

Discussion

 * Note that the candidate has yet to provide a nominating statement or formally accept the nom, despite the fact that they have indeed transcluded already. I've counseled them on this point at their talk page. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

 * Er, sorry, but this is quite an obvious WP:NOTNOW candidacy. You don't need to be an admin at the moment, not with your current activity level. Reverting vandalism does not require admin tools. See WP:TWINKLE. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 12:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) While I applaud your enthusiasm, and can forsee you becoming an administrator in the future if you keep up with your current learning curve, but at the moment I don't feel your ready. Particularly I don't think you yet understand the ethos of the deletion processes fully (something that can only come with experience). I also find your lack of edit summaries disapointing (almost all the ones you have used have been automatic) and well below the standards I expect of an administrator in this regard - although take hear that this is something that is very easily improved. Thryduulf (talk) 12:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) You should try out more of the features available, such as the move button, and upload files. Administrators will be expected to help out with and understand all these common sort of activities. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - you do not have enough experience (400 contribs, 3 months). I suggest you withdraw this application, and consider re-applying after you've been active for at least a year, and have several thousand contributions.  Chzz  ► 12:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Sorry, but WP:NOTNOW. Your enthusiasm is great, and please don't feel your efforts are not appreciated - they are! However you simply don't have the experience at the moment. The NOTNOW page has some good advice and links, and the helpful commentary on your talk is also worth heeding. Pedro : Chat  13:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.