Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SimpsonsFan08 2


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

SimpsonsFan08
[ Voice your opinion] (talk page) '''(0/2/0); Scheduled to end 20:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC).  Closed per user's comment  Enigma ''' message 20:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

- I just came to Wikipedia. Within 1 Minute, SimpsonsFan08 was welcoming me. He helped so much with great links. Anyone could do this, but he was extremly friendly. He hasn't got many contributions (anearly 700), but all of them in one month. I think it's great. He's already got 2 barnstars + one I gave him. He's great. MrWP (talk) 20:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Can I add to that the fact? I know the blocking, deletion etc. policies. I also know the Speedy Deletion criteria and things like this. I know that I haven't 1000 edits, but if users think I am admin material, I hope I can pass this. I would really love to become an admin. SimpsonsFan08   talk 20:33, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


 * Of course i'll accept. SimpsonsFan08   talk 20:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Like I said in my last RfA, vandilism. It's happended to me and I want to help stop it. I also want to work with helping users, like I did with MrWP. + Anything else requested for me (as long as it's ok, not vandilism).


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: Well, I think the most valuble are help desk contributions, but my best would probably be in the the sims portal.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No, only the little ones when trying to answer questions on the help desk before other users.

General comments

 * Links for SimpsonsFan08:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/SimpsonsFan08 before commenting.''

Discussion
Talk about dubious. I smell sockpuppetry. Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 20:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Somebody please close this. Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 20:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I removed it from the main RfA page. You withdrew an RfA yesterday, saying "This is because: this is bad timing as I would not be able to fufil my admin duties." Sorry, another RfA a day or so later is not appropriate.  Enigma  message 20:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It wasn't even me who put this here. Close It, but tell MrWP. SimpsonsFan08   talk 20:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This is going to way heavily against you if you ever decide to run in the future. It is patently obvious that this is a bad faith nomination, either by a meat or sock. Even if it is coincidental, you should know better not to accept the nomination so soon after the other. Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  <font color="#17001E">C ) 20:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * Support Certainly. You are real admin material. I've been checking the links, but is there any more? MrWP (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose To recent since last RFA, too few edits, too little experience, questionable nom.  MBisanz  talk 20:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - Way too soon, sorry. I'm also suspicious of your nomination. &mdash;  scetoaux (T|C)  20:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.