Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tarheel95


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Nomination
(talk page) (0/2/0); Scheduled to end 01:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)  Closed per WP:NOTNOW by –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

– I'd like to nominate myself for adminship. I am a member of the CVU task force and enjoy reverting vandalism using Twinkle and the rollback feature. I also enjoy welcoming new users and participating in AfD votes. Although I do not posses many edits, I feel that RfA should be based on trust. I will gladly accept any constructive critisim to build on in the future. T-95 (talk)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I Will spend most, if not all of my time as an administrator in the fight against vandalism. I feel that blatant vandalism is unacceptable on Wikipedia and therefore will spend most of my time dealing with ARV and reverting vandalism as I do now. I also would like to participate in the voting process of AfD's, especially a repeat nomination.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: Adding content, sources, and templates to new articles. I enjoy participating in the cleanup process of an article and will continue to do so as an administrator.I also enjoy assisting other users in the fight against vandalism, as stated before.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:I do not recall any conflicts in the past.

General comments

 * Links for Tarheel95:
 * Edit summary usage for Tarheel95 can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Tarheel95 before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose You do not have the experience needed of an administrator.  You also do not have enough edits for me to judge how you will use the admin tools.  Maybe after more experience...  -  down  load  |  sign!  01:24, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose You need more experience before I could support you for adminship.  MBisanz  talk 01:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.