Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tharnton345 2


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Tharnton345
[ FINAL]  (talk page) '''(0/3/0); Closed by user:Balloonman 20:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC) as WP:NOTNOW

- Hi again. It's me. Tharnton345 (talk) 19:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Just the same as last. Tharnton345 (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: Just the same as last.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: Just the same as last.

General comments

 * See Tharnton345's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Tharnton345:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Tharnton345 before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose, as even without delving deeply into this candidate, s/he fails #1 of my criteria to support, by a fair margin. Still a WP:NOTNOW in my view. Also, the abrupt "refer-to-last-time" answers fail #6 of my criteria as well, and this method does this candidate no favors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by S. Dean Jameson (talk • contribs)
 * 2) Oppose. I'm not sure if this is is a genuine application, or if Tharnton is trying to make a point. In any case, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. Tharnton's contributions and answers are wholly inadequate. Tharnton, if you would like me to give more extensive feedback, I'll be happy to do so at your Talk page. Axl (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose, inadequate... everything. Answers, contributions, even the initial statement reflect a WP:NOTNOW situation at best. I'm not willing to vote for someone who knows so little of policy that he can't even put his RfA in the right place on the page; I can see this getting SNOWed out. Ironholds 20:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.