Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TheGRVOfLightning


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

TheGRVOfLightning
Final (0/2/1); ended 09:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC) - withdrawn by candidate - The GRVO fLigh tning  (talk)	 09:01, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination
– I have been editing Wikipedia since June, 2013. In that time I have made over 3,000 edits. Multiple new userboxes and a completely new template for ANZ Championship seasons. The GRVO fLigh tning (talk)	 07:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Investigating potential 3RR violations, Removing vandalism, Partake in major discussion at Articles for Deletion and Other manually inducing tasks.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: My best contribution would possibly be the template I created to show all the awards for the ANZ Championship, I feel it is my best due to the amount of time and effort taken to create it. It may be seen here: User:TheGRVOfLightning/sandbox


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: A few conflicts regarding some disputes, Usually I deal with it by discussing the matter on the user in questions talk page. In the future I will most likely deal with it in the same way as it has usually resolved conflicts. 

General comments

 * Links for TheGRVOfLightning:
 * Edit summary usage for TheGRVOfLightning can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose I can't support this candidacy at present, because while I'm sure the user has good intentions, they simply haven't gained enough experience yet for adminship.  Rcsprinter123    (gas)  @ 08:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If I may ask in regards to experience, How would I be able to gain more experience? The GRVO fLigh tning  (talk)	 08:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - A couple years away, assuming you edit pretty vigorously. Jus  da  fax   08:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I shall withdraw this nomination under WP:NOTNOW The GRVO fLigh tning  (talk)	 08:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Not Now Thank you for your contributions, but you need a bit more experience and probably around 10,000 edits. Good luck next time around! -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I just noticed you are withdrawing your candidacy. Thank you. That shows good judgement. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) too soon hardly any Wikipedia space edits including only one visit to ANI shows that you are a committed contributor who has not yet been sucked into the hate pit that is a our noticeboard system. Unfortunately, this also shows that you don't have the experience in the admin areas yet to be ready for the tools. Spartaz Humbug! 08:03, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I do accept that I haven't often entered the Wikipedia Space, However it is mainly because I focus on improving articles however I will enter the noticeboard a large amount if I am approved as an administrator to do manually inducing tasks. The GRVO fLigh tning  (talk)	 08:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC
 * unfortunately, it goes the other way. Plus you have no experience of AN3 or deletion at all so would be wholly ill prepared to use admin tools there. Spartaz Humbug! 08:26, 25 May 2015 (UTC).
 * I wouldn't say I have none, However. I would say I don't have a high level of experience in that regard but I do think I'd improve in that respect as my admin tenure went on. The GRVO fLigh tning  (talk)	 08:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.