Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/The Great Editor In Chief


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

The Great Editor In Chief
[ Voice your opinion] (talk page) (0/4/0); Scheduled to end 02:55, 20 July 2008 (UTC) Closed per WP:NOTNOW. RichardΩ612  Ɣ ɸ 18:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

- This user is new, fresh, and can trully bring forth a lot of knowledge and power to adminship. --02:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)I Am The Great Editor in Chief (talk)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I ACCEPT!--I Am The Great Editor in Chief (talk) 02:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I intend to to take on a new role to adminship. I am going to work hard to be able to help the Wikiproject and bring more users to their full potential.  I also plan on working on the true definition of vandalism and make sure that what the world reads on Wikipedia is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: My best contributions haven't been anything specific. I try my best to make constsant helpful edits to Wikipedia and continue to do so for the rest of my life.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I have so far to date not been in any editing conflicts and no users have caused me any stress. I will deal with it in the future by keeping my head up high and working towards my goals.  Thank you!

General comments

 * See The Great Editor In Chief's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for The Great Editor In Chief:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/The Great Editor In Chief before commenting.''

Discussion

 * Someone please close this one. S. Dean Jameson 18:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Moral support oppose — WP:NOTNOW, you did not follow the nomination instructions, you may wish to read carefully in future! Good luck. — CycloneNimrod Talk? 16:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. Account less than a month old, less than 500 contributions, and placed a retaliatory !vote on Cyclone's RfA in response to Cyclose very gentle reminder above. S. Dean Jameson 17:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - account is far too new, and this edit speaks to the editor's maturity. – xeno cidic ( talk ) 17:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose I view users nominating themselves for adminship after less than a month on the project as prima facie evidence of not being ready for the mop yet George The Dragon (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) I don't normally pile-on, but this says it all. – iride scent 18:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC

Neutral

 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.