Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Uebelhoer


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Uebelhoer
Final (0/8/0); ended 23:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC) per WP:SNOW — usernamekiran (talk)   23:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination
– I have edited Wikipedia for a good amount of time, I have been blocked before, but I have learned from my mistakes and no longer tolerate vandalism or anything of the sort, I believe that I can help Wikipedia as an admin. I have done a significant amount of edits and have gotten stronger throughout the years. Wikipedia is not a place to mess around. I hope I will be considered for a spot as an administrator. Thank you.

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I intend to show people how to edit wikipedia by providing guidance and help throughout other wikipedians journeys.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I believe my best contribution was the creation of Adam Smith, because it provided information of a new football manager, and has been widely expand very quickly since its creation.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I have been in conflicts with other users, but I have communicated with them and firgued out the problem and learned a great deal.

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Discussion
RfAs for this user: 
 * Links for Uebelhoer:
 * Edit summary usage for Uebelhoer can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Strong oppose Blocked in the last 12 months, talk page full of unaddressed warnings. More likely to be blocked again than to be made an admin. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  22:55, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. Sounds like WP:NOTNOW to me. Enterprisey (talk!) 23:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 3) Strong oppose - NOTNOW, possibly not ever. Here for almost 4 years, has only 562 edits, couldn't properly transclude their RFA, warnings on talk page for vandalism, blocked six months ago.  Their very self-nomination shows that they have extremely poor judgment. There's absolutely nothing here that would say "support". I urge the candidate to cut their loses and withdraw immediately. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose Fails my criteria. Candidate lacks clue. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 23:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose -- someone blocked for vandalism doesn't seem like a good candidate for adminship. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 23:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose with regret. The candidate fails my criteria. I strongly encourage them to withdraw before this gets ugly. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 7) Snow, SVP. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 8) Snow &#40;&#40;&#40;The Quixotic Potato&#41;&#41;&#41; (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

General comments


---
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.