Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/UtherSRG

UtherSRG (36/0/0); ends 20:00, 13 April 2004 (UTC)
Uther has contributed some excellent content as well as done copious housekeeping work, by, for example, welcoming many new users. Perhaps most important, Uther appears to be trustworthy. He has made 6,500+ edits since 4 December 2003. Chris Roy 20:01, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Aw shucks! Thanks, Chris! I accept. (BTW - I'm a he.) I'm honored to be nominated, and I'd be honored if accepted into the ranks. I will note that I've lost my cool a couple of times, but I'm only human. - UtherSRG 20:06, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that! :-( Fixed. Chris Roy 20:12, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Support:
 * 1) Chris Roy 20:01, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) Dori | Talk 20:04, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC) Nice and friendly, helps with vandalisms.
 * 3) Finlay McWalter | Talk 20:05, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Cecropia 20:08, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC) Enthusastically support. Has worked on many article and done a lot of the necessary but underappreciated "dog work."
 * 5) &mdash; Jor (Talk) 21:53, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC) He wasn't one already? About time!
 * 6) A wonderful choice, and one I should have thought to nominate earlier! Jwrosenzweig 23:30, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) Decumanus | Talk 23:32, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Let's see, what's that line... "Thought he already was one."  I've never seen anything but good from him.  Isomorphic 01:15, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 9) Jiang 01:19, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) He's not?? I'm shocked and appalled. Meelar 05:31, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 11) Support. Has done a lot of work welcoming newcomers. Angela. 08:56, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) Support. R ADICAL B ENDER &#9733;  12:48, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) fabiform | talk 12:53, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) Ambivalenthysteria 13:34, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 15) T&#949;x &#964; ur&#949; 14:07, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 16) Pollinator 14:11, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 17) Warofdreams 16:28, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 18) Graham :) | Talk 22:28, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, of course! I'm sorry I didn't nominate him myself. -- Hadal 03:08, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 1) I'm going to jump on the "I wish I nominated him bandwagon and point out that I was going to in early February or so, but decided to wait until the end of the month, then forgot. Tuf-Kat 04:24, Apr 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) Ok. Maximus Rex 04:38, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC) &#8857;
 * 3) This guy is known to leap into a just-created article and make grammar and punctuation corrections. Definitely the kind of dedication we want to see. Philwelch 08:04, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Danny 12:01, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) Tannin 12:12, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC) Of course.
 * 6) Secretlondon 12:39, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) L UDRAMAN  | T 12:45, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) &mdash;Morven 18:38, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC) Seen nothing but good stuff.
 * 9) jengod 19:32, Apr 9, 2004 (UTC) What Meelar said.
 * 10) +sj+ 02:05, 2004 Apr 10 (UTC) With all due haste.
 * 11) Visorstuff 23:09, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) Stewart Adcock 17:59, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) Hephaestos|&#167; 18:03, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) I came here to nominate him, dammit! No-One Jones 19:31, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 15) Yes! Friendly, willing to discuss, and works hard. --Lowellian 20:02, Apr 12, 2004 (UTC)
 * 16) Mee too! Surprised he isn't one. Smerdis of Tlön 00:13, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 17) Is anyone NOT supporting? - Fennec 03:22, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * 18) Looks unanimous -- let's all say in unison: "I thought he was already an admin!" --Uncle Ed 13:25, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Oppose:

Neutral: