Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/VampWillow

User:VampWillow
VampWillow has been here since March and has about 1600 contributions. Lots of good new articles and edits, a good understanding of NPOV and wikiquette, and an interest in admin-type tasks (marking for deletion, advising new users on style, etc). --   ALargeElk | Talk 14:27, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * Very happy to accept (if you'll all have me, of course;-) --VampWillow 14:58, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support


 * 1) --    ALargeElk | Talk 14:27, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) Ilyanep 14:34, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC) Looks fine to me.
 * 3) David Gerard 14:37, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Finlay McWalter |  Talk 14:50, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) OwenBlacker 15:05, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) theresa knott 15:14, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC) (even though it would make her "not normal" ;-))
 * 7) I did wonder if anyone would remember that ... ;-) VampWillow 15:19, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Support --"D ICK " C HENEY 15:21, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 9) Warofdreams 15:38, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) Jwrosenzweig 15:51, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 11) john k 16:08, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:17, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) Charles Matthews 16:47, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) Morwen - Talk 18:46, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 15) Merovingian  &#9997; Talk 23:20, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)
 * 16) James F. (talk) 03:06, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 17) "This is a dumb world. In my world there are people in chains, and we can ride them like ponies." (Support.) jengod 23:10, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * 18) Lst27 02:46, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 19) MykReeve 03:09, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 20) Fredrik | talk 12:47, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 21) +sj +  17:25, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC) Mmmm-bop.
 * 22) --GeneralPatton 23:32, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 23) Woggly 08:27, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 24) older &ne; wiser 23:27, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 25) "Bored now." :D -- Michael Warren 22:42, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 26) ditto. Secretlondon 02:04, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Charles Matthews 16:47, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC) We met at the London meet-up and - I'll say this: quieter than David Gerard.
 * At the risk of not being sure if I want to hear the answer, is that a 'good' or a 'bad' thing? :-) --VampWillow 16:55, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Good, definitely good. But the WP soundproofing seems, well, sound. Charles Matthews 20:59, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * That's saying very little indeed ... - David Gerard 17:07, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)