Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Vanilla2


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Vanilla
WP:SNOW close at (0/9/0) End time: 1:19 15 August 2007 - YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Vanilla2 00:26, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I would do just about anything to keep wikipedia safe


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I've only done a few edits but i'll make way more


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No not really

General comments

 * See Vanilla's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Vanilla:

''Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Vanilla before commenting.''

Discussion


Support

Oppose
 * 1) Strong oppose, you've only been here like a month, made a handful of edits, don't use edit summaries or the minor edit button...you can't run yet. Cheers,  Je tL ov e r (talk) 00:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose 18 edits, poor answers. Wizardman  00:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose and suggest withdrawl the list of reasons why this won't pass go on and on. I highly suggest that you withdraw. --L ucid 00:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose I don't even know which one of you is running. But neither of you is qualified.  New  England  Review Me! 00:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It's Vanilla2, not Vanilla. Or at least I think. Cheers,  Je tL ov e r (talk) 00:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose, but if you keep your answers to the questions, you will be successful in the future.  bibliomaniac 1 5  00:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose, very poor answers, handful of edits, near malformed rfa... sorry, no. :( -WarthogDemon 00:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - too early.  Mi r a n da   01:00, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose, but with no ill-will. Here's how it works.  Edit here for a few months, preferably four to six; get to know some people; get a good reputation for common sense, maturity, intelligence, good judgement; get some experience across several project spaces; then someone will nominate you.  Best of luck in the future!  Antandrus  (talk) 01:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose Sorry but you have a lack of experience. Please don't let this discourage you please. — M o e   ε  01:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.