Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Wesley

User:Wesley
BoNoMoJo is absolutely right (comment below in Mkmcconn's nomination) -- Wesley has done an excellent job here -- almost 3,500 edits since October 2001. He does a good job finding consensus, and is very worthy of adminship, in my opinion. Jwrosenzweig 23:05, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)


 * Thanks... I think. I'll accept with the understanding that there's no accompanying obligation to spend even more time here. Naturally I'd like to stick around and help Wikipedia continue to grow into its potential. Wesley 04:56, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Support:
 * 1) Jwrosenzweig
 * 2) Wesley is an excellent contributor. B 23:14, Mar 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) support. Perl 23:23, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Tuf-Kat 00:40, Mar 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) Need more consensus builders Davodd 01:55, Mar 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) He is able to work on articles concerning religion and not get into edit wars, name calling, or arguments. A model citizen with a keen eye. Kingturtle 02:58, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) Support. Angela. 03:57, Mar 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Support. -- Jake 07:33, 2004 Mar 5 (UTC)
 * 9) Support. Pfortuny 16:12, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) Support. He uses talk pages how they were designed. Works well to build consensus.  -Visorstuff 17:32, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 11) Support. Excellent work Pollinator 03:01, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) Michael Snow 21:31, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) Way overdue. Excellent sense of judgment on religon, a notoriously difficult realm to be neutral about. Uncle Ed 17:35, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) Support. Mkmcconn 19:57, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 15) Support. RadicalBender 02:02, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 16) Respects what makes WP great.  Support. +sj+ 22:49, 2004 Mar 10 (UTC)
 * 17) Hephaestos|&#167; 23:46, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 18) Support Danny 12:47, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)