Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/WikiMan53


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

WikiMan53
Final (0/11/0); Ended 00:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

– I am a nice caring person who wants to do good. WikiMan53 T/C edits 00:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept.

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A: Any that need to be done I will be happy to do!


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A: I am proud of them all as long as their useful and thoughtful


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No, I haven't. But if I do I will listen open endedly. The editor might have some relivant information. Plus, it might show me how to fix some of my flaw


 * General comments
 * Account created two weeks ago. -Amarkov blahedits 00:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Discussion



Support
 * Extreme moral support. Please withdraw now. -Amarkov blahedits 00:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Oppose Neutral
 * 1) Oppose, extremely weak answers to questions, only 264 edits, only substantial edits to Wikipedia-space are to the sandbox. Annoying orange fake message bar is not good, and that you didn't know how to list this page properly at WP:RFA shows you are not experienced enough to be an admin. Sorry, but not yet. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 00:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose Please withdraw before the sledgehammer of oppose !votes comes slamming down. We appreciate your eagerness, and we ask you to keep up the good work, but you are still not ready for adminship. --210physicq  (c ) 00:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Addendum The fake new messages bar on your talkpage does not help matters. --210physicq  (c ) 00:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how big of a problem that is, I've seen a few established editors with it. -Amarkov blahedits 00:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not so much a rationale for opposing than an annoyance. There are more pressing reasons than a nagging orange bar. ;-) --210physicq  (c ) 00:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose Please withdraw and come back after a number of months and many more edits throughout wikipedia. Kukini 00:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Strong Oppose your answers to the questions did it for me, please withdrawal. &mdash; SeadogTalk 00:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose Sorry, but you need a lot more experience in all areas. I also find this rather disturbing. I strongly recommend self-withdrawal.-- Hús  ö  nd  00:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Um... did he really oppose someone for lack of experience, with his level? Okay, I really can't moral support now. -Amarkov blahedits 00:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Too many problems for me to moral support. -Amarkov blahedits 00:49, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose You have a very minimal amount of edits on the mainspace, and have shown me you personally adore "power". Come back in 12 months and do a complete lifestyle change, I may consider going to neutral. Somitho 01:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) I wouldn't be surprised if this ends up being SNOWed. Scob e ll302 01:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Sledgehammer of Opposition Your account is more or less two weeks old. You don't have nearly enough edits to Wikipedia. Also, that annoying fake message bar on your page is annoying. If you wish to be an Administrator, first prove to us that you are able. We already know you are willing.  S h a r k f a c e  2 1 7  01:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose I don't wish to bite a new user but after the comment on Dina's RfA there's only one possible answer and that's NO this user is not experienced enough to become an administrator at this time. I'd be quite happy to consider supporting after this user has been around and editing for a couple of months, though support would depend on ability at that time. --Kind Regards - Heligoland  | Talk |  Contribs 01:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose You don't have enough experience with Wikipedia. You have less than 500 edits in Wikipedia with low mainspace edits. You don't participate in GA/FA nominations and you don't participate for article for deletion. you should revert vandalism to some extent because as in admin, you must be able to block/banned users who cause persistant vandalism. You have poor answers in your question, because none of those things require admin position. Please come back with more edits and more experience.-- PrestonH  | talk  |  contribs  |  editor review  | 01:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.