Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Will merchant


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

will_merchant
Final (2/8/3); ended 06:22, 03 January 2007 (UTC)

– YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Will merchant 21:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I will accept it

I will close this RfA early as the universal opinion expressed below is of lack of experience on the part of will merchant. This can only be resolved with dedicated application to tasks in the various spaces of Wikipedia, which will not occur in the next five days. (aeropagitica) 06:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi everyone, I think that I would be a good candidate for nomination because I care about making Wikipedia a better place for students wishing to gather information to write papers for school. Since being a student involves alot of time researching, I would like to help them by making Wiki a one stop shop for information. I don't want them to have to worry about people tampering with the info on the site so I would work diligently to stop other users from vandalizing the site. I would also like to share the information I know by contributing to the automotive section in that I am familiar. Thank you for allowing me a chance to help make this site better. --Will Merchant

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A: I plan to mainly serve to block users that have the primary wish to vandalize the site.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A: My contributions in the Saab 900 section are the sort of contributions I will be doing, and only in the subjects I truely know.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you believe other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I haven't had any stress or conflicts over editing yet. But when I do, I will try my best to handle any conflict in a polite professional manner, just as if this was my job.


 * General comments

Discussion



Support
 * 1) Moral Support Your heart is in the right place. I suggest you spend at least 6 months at WP:FPC, WP:AFD, WP:RFA, WP:PUMP, WP:SSP, join some Wiki-projects, interact with the community (in general, besides all the administrative stuff), and fight vandals.  S h a r k f a c e  2 1 7  03:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Moral Support - you're obviously making a good faith nomination, and your intentions are great, but you really need to spend time around Wikipedia first. Get involved in recent changes patrolling, articles for deletion, and contribute! Remember, we're an encyclopedia here, so try to get a featured article; it will greatly help with your next nomination. Cheers! Yuser31415 03:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Oppose. User has 16 edits, half to this RfA. Needs experience. (RfA candidates generally have >3000 edits, among many other qualifications.) Grand  master  ka  03:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose and suggest withdrawl - your intentions are good, and I have nothing against new users, but with around 20 edits, we have no indication that we can trust you with the admin tools or that you would know how to properly use them. Fabricationary 03:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose and suggest withdrawal - You have good intentions, but 20 edits is really not enough. Multiply your current edits by 150 and then come back, and you will have a better chance.  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I appriciate your enthusiasm, but Strongest oppose and suggest withdrawal per 4 "actual" edits. I'm not trying to bite, but try and get yourself involved in wikipedia before applying here. AfD is a good start.-- Wizardman 03:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose and suggest withdrawl per above. Iced Kola  03:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Firm oppose per Fabricationary, who properly observes that there is, at the end of the day, no empirical record on which one might reasonably base any conclusions apropos of the candidate's fitness for adminship, such that one can in no way be certain that the net effect on the project of the candidate's becoming an admin should be positive. Joe 05:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose and suggest withdrawal, you need more experience in admin proccess. We know you have good intentions, but 20 edits is simply too low. Get yourself more active in Wikipedia and run for RFA in six months time. Terence Ong 05:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose. Your keenness is certainly appreciated, but you are not yet experienced enough to become an admin. Most successful admin candidates have made at least 2,000 Wikipedia edits, and a track record of several months as a consistent, positive contributor. This allows the community to develop the trust in them to agree to give them the adminship tools. Right now, just keep contributing as a regular editor becuase you don't need to be an admin to help build the encyclopedia. Good luck if you decide to apply for adminship again sometime in the future after significantly stepping-up your contributions. Zaxem 05:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1) Neutral - brand new editor; I was just about to drop off a welcome message, but got beaten to it a few seconds ago. Very few edits, although what I do see looks productive. Email not enabled. Stick around for awhile, until you're more familiar with the wiki, then try again if you like, eh? ;) It's an awfully big site, no need to take this step so soon. There are still plenty of ways for you to contribute. Luna Santin 03:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Neutral: Since you say you're interested in blocking vandals, you should consider getting involved in the vandal fight now. You don't have to be an admin to revert vandalism and warn vandals. Have a look at Vandalism and you should get some good ideas for what you can do now. Heimstern Läufer 03:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Neutral I'm sorry I cannot vote for you at this time. You need more experience on the project, however your edits so far are a good start. Keep up the good work and if all goes well, try again in a few months. TSO1D 04:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.