Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Willy, your mate


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Willy, your mate
[ Voice your opinion] (talk page) FINAL (0/5/0); Closed 02:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC), withdrawn 

- I would like to be an admin, because I have been whacking vandals and marking nonsense articles for speedy deletion. Other things I've done, I viewed the RFU category and deleted trolling unblocks, unblocks when they aren't blocked at all or if they're using the wrong template. I have made a few mistakes though, but I always tried my best. Please remind me if I make any mistakes please... I may have been staying here for not a very long time, but I have been very helpful. Willy, your mate 01:26, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Fighting vandalism, deleting nonsense articles, unblocks... probably everything that I need to do.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: Vandal-Fighting, marking nonsense articles for speedy deletion, contributing to any articles that I could find, and dealing with the wrong templates, unblock trolling or unblocks when they are not even blocked at all because this helped make things clean.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: Yes, I have. Sometimes when the vandals made more than one trolling edit. And sometimes when I made mistakes and assumed bad faith.

General comments

 * See Willy, your mate's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Willy, your mate:

''Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Willy, your mate before commenting.''

Discussion

 * I suggest withdrawl; with a low edit count and minimal experience, this RfA won't pass. Giggy  UCP 01:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Support

Oppose
 * 1) I suggest you withdraw this and apply again later. Your first edit was on July 2. You should have at least a few months of experience. Andre (talk) 01:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Andre. 'nuff said.--Chaser - T 01:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Disagreeing with the above, I think you are quite experienced. Too experienced. I am too suspicious about you to make a conscientious support.  J- stan  Talk  01:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose- Only 511 total edits and not even a full month of experience. Poor edit summary usage. Only 20 edits to the Wikipedia namespace. You say you want to block vandals, but you have no reports to WP:AIV or any other admin-related area. Not much communication with other users. I strongly suggest withdrawal and that you continue to work on WIkipedia for a few moths and try again later. -- Boricua  e  ddie  01:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose Barely over 500 edits, and hasn't even been editing a full month. Now, judging by edit count can be silly, but that's way too low (and also fairly suspicious that a new user would progress that quickly) -- L ie! 02:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Neutral


 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.