Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Xchrisblackx


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Xchrisblackx
Final (0/6/0) ended 15:49, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

– O.k. I am becoming more known on Wikipedia and have been on this site for about a year. I have made small edits here and there, comments that have helped many people and have joined two anti vandalism sites. I feel maybe it's time for me to try out for adminship --Dr. Mahongany 13:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

Oppose
 * 1) I had to fix this editor's malformed RfA. Without looking at much else, I think it's safe to say anyone incapable of following the instructions here isn't familiar enough with Wikipedia to be an admin. Johnleemk | Talk 13:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose: Only 116 edits. Editcountitis it may be, but 116 edits is far too little in anyone's book.  That said, if you used edit summaries more often and you hit, say, 1500 edits (not a lot, honest!) or something, I might consider.  You are doing a reasonably good job at Wikipedia at the moment.  Keep up the good work, but I also strongly suggest you withdraw.   x42bn6   Talk  13:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose, Being active for less than four months, with less than 120 edits, you are much too new to try for adminship. Just keep up the good work, take a look at the adminship standards of some of the voters here, and reapply when you're ready. --Deathphoenix 13:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose: premature. Please withdraw this and for the next few months concentrate on building the encyclopedia in areas you know about. Don't forget to use an edit summary each time. Jonathunder 14:14, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose Sorry but your edit counts are unimpressive. If you have a minimum of 2000 edits, I may consider. Try again in a few months. You are too new for adminship. But keep up the good work! -- S iva1979 Talk to me  14:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose You seem to have your heart in the right place, but I feel you should get to grips with Wikipedia more before applying again. As Deathphoenix says, investigate the adminship standards and you'll see why this is the case. Essexmutant 15:12, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments


 * Edit summary usage: 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. Based on the last 13 major and 1 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces. Mathbot 13:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * See Xchrisblackx's edit count and contribution tree with Interiot's tool.



Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A.


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.