Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Xezbeth

Xezbeth
final (29/1/0) ending 22:24 18 April 2005 (UTC)

Excellent user. He made many articles about films. He made about 11700 edits since August 2004. I believe, that he will be a good admin. -- Darwinek 22:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Candidate please indicate acceptance of the nomination here
 * Accept, and thanks for the nomination. Xezbeth  06:42, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) Very strong support. - Darwinek 22:25, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. I have seen his work and believe he would make an excellent admin. Zzyzx11 | Talk 23:03, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. I've come to know and trust his opinion and judgement on Vfd, and I feel he would be responsible and helpful. Meelar (talk) 23:43, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) RickK 23:56, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC) We frequently disagree on the VfD pages, Xezbeth has always been someone who's easy to work with.
 * 5) A definite. Grutness|hello? [[Image:Grutness.jpg|25px|]] 00:30, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Support. User and talk pages show us an editor who communicates well and works well with others. Jonathunder 03:21, 2005 Apr 12 (UTC)
 * 7) Support. Seen him in VfD. jni 05:58, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Support. Great contributor. Admins are made of such stuff. Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy)  07:48, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) I always thought the name was some sort of play on Elizabeth. So I guess I was completely wrong. I see now what it means...I hope the user doesn't take after his namesake any. Everyking 11:01, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 10) Thought he was one. -- M e r o v i n g i a n  (t) (c) 11:30, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * 11) A fantastic contributor who works well with others, I have every faith that he will be a good admin. Rje 11:41, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * 12) Easy decision. utcursch | talk 12:12, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * 13) Support. An excellent user. Sjakkalle 12:23, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 14) Support. I would love to have such stamina. Pavel Vozenilek 01:06, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 15) Support. Everything I have seen is quite good.  Antandrus 01:14, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 16) Support he makes good edits and is very well liked --Zeerus 01:16, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * 17) Support, not that litotes are particularly explanatory but I have no reason to oppose. :) Cburnett 06:44, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * 18) Support. Radiant_* 13:50, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * 19) PedanticallySpeaking 17:06, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * 20) Lst27 ( t a l k )  21:56, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 21) Support--nixie 03:12, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 22) Support - Great work on categorization. - SimonP 20:40, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * 23) Support Feel we Gnomes ought to stick together.  Alai 04:11, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 24) SupportGeni 22:38, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 25) Enthusiastically support. Fantastic editor! - Lucky 6.9 03:34, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 11,000+ edits?! Support Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  18:49, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Strong Support. Only ecountered her recently but this revert proves, for me, that she has what it takes. An hour of work would have been lost without her. Thanks. -JCarriker 20:16, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. Dbiv 11:12, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:08, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Very Strong Oppose Dwain 22:51, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Any particular reason? Grutness|hello? [[Image:Grutness.jpg|25px|]]
 * Concur on the rationale request. Cburnett 02:39, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * I may be wrong, but it probably has something to do with this] VfD. Xezbeth  06:32, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments
 * Xezbeth currently has 11694 total edits: 10654/59 to articles/talk, 576 to Wikipedia, 201/1 to Category/talk, 116 to Image, 47/36 to User/talk, and 4 to Template. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 22:58, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * What kind of bot/tool are you using? (Around 500 edits just yesterday!) Pavel Vozenilek 03:09, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Thirteen of which were non-minor edits to articles. SlimVirgin (talk) 04:27, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't use a bot, but as SlimVirgin says a lot of my edits are minor; either adding categories or wikifying. Xezbeth  06:42, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
 * A. I'll probably become more involved on VfD, as well as continue with RC patrolling and new page patrolling.
 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A. Not particularly; I try to edit a broad range of articles so I haven't done any huge amounts of work on a single page. I suppose I'm pleased with my contributions to film articles, though a lot of my edits are formatting or copyediting.
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
 * A. No, but then again I don't edit the more controversial articles very often. I'd comment on talk pages if I feel the need to, but I wouldn't get stressed over it.