Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Yatesy1988


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

yatesy1988
Final: (0/5/0); Ended 15:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC) per snowball clause by Daniel; Scheduled to end 01:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

- honest fair accurate y8c 01:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: sporting work mainly football


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: rangers f.c. pages as i have given correct up to date stats and information


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:not been in conflict to be honest

General comments

 * See yatesy1988's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for yatesy1988:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/yatesy1988 before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose Thanks for the offer, but I would encourage you to spend a little more time getting to know us and the processes here. Maybe come back in a few months. JodyBRoll, Tide, Roll 12:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose at this stage, not cos you've done anything wrong but just because you don't have enough experience for me to judge how good you are. As Jody says, come back in a couple of months with a bit more experience under your belt; you might want to get some experience discussing Articles for Deletion as well. —  iride  scent  13:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose, you may have to elaborate on your answer to question 1, as sporting work isn't admin work (though it's always good to continue article writing when you become an admin), so I don't know what you would use the tools for. Wizardman  13:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Strong oppose Answers to questions were not good enough, and it tells me that this user is not yet ready to be an admin. Try again in few months with much better answers and I will support you. NHRHS2010  talk  13:57, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose per NHRHS2010. Honestly, the answers to the questions were quite poor.  As an administrator, you're entrusted with significant tools, and in order to earn that trust, you need to demonstrate your understanding of Wikipedia's policies and how they would affect and guide you in your role as an administrator.  Try again in a few months.  Good luck Folic_Acid 14:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.