Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/rp0211


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

rp0211
Final (0/4/0); Closed as WP:NOTNOW by King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; at 00:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination
– Rp0211 (talk) 23:57, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: If I become an administrator, I plan to use this power to enhance Wikipedia articles. The main power I would use would be to semi-protect and/or protect Wikipedia pages that receive high levels of vandalism. Also, I would put reliable sources on various articles to make facts highly accurate.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: My best contributions to Wikipedia have been creating several articles, including: SWX Right Now, Friday Night Lights (SWX show), Toyota's Best Doggone Zags Show, The Mark Few Show, and 2010-11 Gonzaga Bulldogs men's basketball team. These contributions are important to Wikipedia because they provide accurate knowledge that may not have been put on Wikipedia, if it wasn't for myself. Also, I have been a major contributor to KHQ-TV by providing reliable and accurate sources for specific facts, that otherwise may have never been added.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: Some users in the past have gotten rid of facts and sources, which can get annoying. Most of the time, I just ignore it, and think no more about it. In the future, however, I would try and use the discussion pages to talk with other users to agree over something.

General comments

 * Links for rp0211:
 * Edit summary usage for rp0211 can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose Just 122 edits. Sorry, nowhere near enough experience to be an admin.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:18, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Not now Not enough experience. Jarkeld (talk) 00:24, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - Not enough experience or understanding of policy. Maybe later. PrincessofLlyr  royal court 00:30, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose Not enough experience to wield the mop safely. -- RP459  Talk/Contributions 00:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.