Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/tdxiang

tdxiang
[ Vote here]  (1/11/1) ending 03:55 [30 September 2005 23 September 2005] (UTC)

– I take photos myself and post them to articles and I clean up messy articles and update events and create new articles to add to the number of good articles to Wikipedia.I am the "disambiguation guy" as some call me as I turn articles into disambigs so users caneasily browse and pick the right article.You won't regret voting for me!


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Self nomination.Tdxiang 12:43, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) Support.His disambigs and the contributions he have made are all very good.Tgenieyi 10:57, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Oppose Neutral
 * 1) Oppose till user specifies an email id. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  10:42, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose until user actually completes the nomination. &mdash; J I P | Talk 12:25, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I will keep my vote as oppose until tdxiang answers all the candidate questions. Then I will change my vote to neutral or support depending on what I think of him. &mdash; J I P | Talk 20:50, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose - will rethink when he's told me why I should support. --Celestianpower hab 12:48, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose: Edit summary usage only 31%. Averages just 2 edits per day (6.7 for contributing days). Distribution of edits is promising, but the overall experience level is, I think, too low for adminship at this time. I also like to see self nominators follow instructions and examples in putting forth their nomination as it shows an ability to follow directions and thus policy; this was not done in this case. --Durin 13:55, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose. Sorry. At the very least, you should fill out all the questions below, including why you want to be an admin and what you intend to use these admin tools for that you can't do right now (and want to). Also, at only ~260 edits, I think you are much too inexperienced to be an admin. After some more experience, you may get more support. :-) --Deathphoenix 16:54, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose Lack of edit summaries. Oleg Alexandrov 17:34, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose Too few edits. Fire Fox T  C   E 17:55, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose&mdash;promising editor, but too few edits. Please try again when you have atleast 1000 edits (atleast 10% of which should be in the Wikipedia namespace). I guarantee that you will have widespread support then! also, here are a few good links: Recent Changes, New pages and AFD. You could also participate in community discussions on a regular basis, and vote here.   Journalist C./ Holla @ me! 
 * 7) Oppose. Too little experience. Questions not answered. BTW, how do you guys know his percentage of edits without summary? --Miborovsky [[Image:Namechop.jpg|20px]] 23:22, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose. Consistent disregard for form. Ignored the questions, rarely bothers with edit summaries--not the type we want as admin. Doesn't need it either, according to his description. Owen&times; &#9742;  01:33, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose. Taking pictures of yourself is not someothing you need admin powers for. Neither is being the "Disambiguation" guy. Type O Spud 03:00, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Seems well intentioned, but not enough edits and experience.--Alhutch 05:05, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Comments

Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
 * A.
 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * AI'm pleased with Fuhua Sec as so far,no vandal has struck it and editors can edit it without having to clean it up.
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A.