Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/uniQue tree


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

uniQue tree
[ Voice your opinion] (talk page) (0/4/0); Ended 01:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC), non-bureaucrat closure by Core desat

- Hello. I would like request sysop rights, because I fight against vandalizm and that doesen't make any sence without the chance of blocking IPs and protecting pages, for example the pages of blocked IPs. The problem is that I have to wait for an admin for ages all the time when a IP is vandalizing. It seems you don't have enough sysops for fighting against vandalizm, so I would be very glad if you give me the chance to help fighting against vandalizm. Greetings  uniQue tree   →talk←  01:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A:


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A:


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:

General comments

 * See uniQue tree's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for uniQue tree:

''Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/uniQue tree before commenting.''

Discussion


Support

Oppose Neutral
 * 1) Oppose and suggest withdrawl Sorry, you mean well, but you're far too new to the project (in addition to the incorrectly submitted and poorly written RFA) to pass an RFA. I highly recommend you withdraw now, and come back in three-six months --L ucid 01:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. I rarely oppose for edits or time served, but you've only been around for nine days, not enough time to be familiar with the place. In response to your nomination statement... Do you know about WP:AIV? That's where you report vandals. I don't see any reports there in your contributions. Grand  master  ka  01:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose You have only been editing for nine days, since August 1. Most admin candidates have been with us for at least three months.  Please get back to work and consider reapplying in three months or later. Shalom Hello 01:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose and suggest withdrawl Actually you've been here for 8 days with not even 500 edits. No way you can have enough experience yet, sorry. -WarthogDemon 01:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) *Sorry, but what is the difference? It's better when I can work effective now than in three month I think... -- uniQue tree   →talk←  01:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Where is the difference? You mean "what" is the difference? The difference is that the longer you're here, the more experience you get. A little more than a week is not enough, plus your efforts are a little extreme . . . . Giving an IP an only warning just for saying El Salvadore sucks? -WarthogDemon 01:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.