Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/zliljoemz

ZLILJOEMZ
[ Voice your opinion] (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 02:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

- Is very passionate about Wikipedia, and keeping it's material up-to-date, and to-the-point. Zliljoemz 02:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A:


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A:


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:

General comments

 * Links for ZLILJOEMZ:

''Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/ZLILJOEMZ before commenting.''

Discussion


Support

Oppose
 * 1) You gotta be kidding. This is User:Zliljoemz, who spelled his/her username incorrectly in two different ways in this self-nom.  This user has 14 total edits on 2 days (today and March 20); sole contributions were trying to add information on a band called "215" to 215, and repeatedly posting Rush Hour 4 after warnings, requiring it to be protected.  He then created Talk:Rush Hour 4 after the deletion, with the content "wow......you people are wierdos.". And then the similar The Grudge: Undone.  NawlinWiki 03:29, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1) Oppose This user has minimal documented experience with Wikipedia, and of the few edits that this user has made, most have been in violation of Wikipedia policy (as illustrated by NawlinWiki), leading me to believe that zliljoemz does not have the understanding of Wikipedia policy needed to be an administrator. Calgary 03:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)