Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Abd and JzG/Evidence/Use and abuse of newenergytimes.com


 * diff, diff: User:Pcarbonn adds a reference to a document on newenergytimes.com to an already existing reference. This reference should give yet another (reliable) view.  The link here (now here) is not accompanied by the original on Science (which I also cannot yet locate) and hence, not a verifiable source.
 * diff: User:Pcarbonn introduces a large part of text, some solely referenced to documentation on newenergytimes.com. E.g. link (I can't find the document on the new server).  Again, the original is not linked (which may be here, suggesting this is not peer reviewed information), making this an unverifiable copy. Still it was used to opinionate the article.
 * diff: User:Pcarbonn adds three times a link to link (now moved, current version not (yet) found) to his previous edit here saying "per WP:CITE#SAYWHEREYOUGOTIT". This suggests that he used newenergytimes.com for information, not using the originals (one of the others clearly on the author's own domain, suggesting original research), and where the documents on newenergytimes.com are synthesised/original research.
 * diff: User:76.246.148.242 (only contribs to Cold Fusion and talk) adds link (now here. The link is a copy of an official publication on Sciencedirect, but the original is not referenced.
 * very old diffs:    : User:Stevenkrivit (site owner) changes the top link to a copy of the same document on his site, and adds other references to his site.
 * more recent diffs:     : User:76.126.194.190 is adding the links here to 6 different wikis over time of a couple of weeks.  The additions look spammy, though possibly appropriate(!), and certainly not on a scale wide enough to allow for meta-blacklisting (but see also other contribs here).