Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence/T-man's replies to commets done on this page


 * POV on Gillespee's last line: He knows better than that. Also: That was probbably the last time I explained I'm obviously not a native English speaker, but it was not even close to the first. Another pov: People with comments like that are encouraging hate issues against North America and England among foreigners. Keep in mind that not so many people over the world love your culture, languaje and idioms and are as open minded as myself when it comes to undertand, forgive and forget fool errors like that. Gillespee just sliped (my povagain), but DA... And to think he is Canadian! "Trudeau would be so proud!" Please no need to reply here. I already forgot this, don't make me remember.
 * POV on Toffile's observations: He is right I do have trouble drawing the line between replying and a personal attack. I do ignore the criteria. I have not read WP:NPA yet. How come I try never to ofend other editors on the summaries like DA or certain guy who seems to be an authorithy on a war with everyone on the history page of the Batman article.


 * Reply to DA's Assertions:
 * 1st. assertion: Monitore the pages you want but not me. The pages I'm sugest you must stop watching, you can always have them linked in your user page to monitore them in a more heathy way. I only ask that due to the way you still acting, I don't want you using them to monitore on me... activity that you already admitted doing and doesn't seem to be stopping or reducing so far until a couple hours ago.
 * He replied he isn't doing so. But evidence on my 4th assertion implies that either he is lying or has bad memory.


 * 2nd. assertion: What kind of person does one call an asshole. Probably some one acting lika a Don't be a dick. It's ironic and kind of fun how even wikipedia likes to call dicks dicks. Don't miss the point, asshole in context meant jerk. The way I said it, it was a strong reply, not a mocking or vandal action implying he is a "chocolate starfish".


 * 4th. assertion: Didn't claim anything. I just don't like you addresing me anymore. I learned you were a regular there just after reading you reply and before writing that "evidence". It did't make your exesively quick replying approach any less creepy. Today I edited JLU. You erased my edits just some minutes later. Add that to the fact that there is no way the list you erased is wrong (or even long) and that you don't watch that show... And you'll understand how come I find you scary.
 * He replied he became a fan of the show, but if so, as the evidence shows, that'd be after his blind reverts and he would had only been a fan for less than a motht. And he'd have to catch up to 14 years of DC Animated Universe. To me, putting wrong facts the way I show he did on my 3rd assertion, is totaly unethical. He knew he didn't know what the hell was he writing when he made the paragraph shown on my 3rd. assertion. Me, every real fan even the "kinda fans" with the least amount of knoledge of the topic, know he made a joke out of the Enemies of Batman article. Even though we are obligated to assume good faith... It's obvious there was no such thing in DA's unethical actions there.


 * Then he wrote:
 * (...)as I have become a fan of the animated series. I simply copyedited a section... I did not erase his edits, but there were about 100 edits by him, so I am sorry if I did so by accident (evidence please). I would ask T-man to stop with the "scary" claims... I am 1000s of kilometres away and not interested in him in the least. Oh, believe me, there is evidence!... Of you erasing a indispensable short list. That is basic to understand the spin that came with that show name change. To me this is and evidence that you can't change editing stuff you already admited you don't know about.


 * Unfortunately, T-man is currently modifying his comments up above to make it very difficult to read what came when. I believe that's what DA actually wants by asking people to stop me from searching new evidence. By doing this: I He usually does this, and in addition to his already poor command of the English language, ts makes it very hard to see what was said and what was replied to. Therefore, please consider my comments above to be in reply to an earlier version of T-man's comments....How convenient.


 * I only care about the final reding of this whole page. I'm not trying to chat here. He knows he has no evidence in his favour.


 * I hope this arbitration isn't just a further opportunity for T-man to complain about imagined wrongdoings by me. He obviously is far more interested in attacking me than editing Wikipedia articles, given the time he is dedicating to this page -Wrong. a. I have to make my case. b. I've been also working on JLU pages researching and updating info. That's caring and loving wikipedia. You on the other hand have contributed by blind reversing info you are barely familiar with, just after I finished editing it and by your apathic reply to comments that were not adressed to you in a fast creepy way. Both after asking you for some space here.


 * PLEASE TELL ME WHAT I HAVE DONE OTHER THAN GOOD EDITS? -Yeah, writing "70s Croc and Black Mask and 80s Bane & Harley know Bruce Wayne is Batman" over and over-erasing info("not for spite")-insult T-man on summaries-good edits. Note: This was not said to imply that you must be baned as you asked, but to point that you and your "good edits" are not as perfect as you claim. I do think you really want to become a real fan of this stuff. And you should be able to write but reseach and make sure you don't get the facts so horrendously wrong. Wesley Dotts and Josiah Rowe have done perfect works by putting info I added in a sharper way in the past. I think you blind reverse people because you feel frustrated you don't have neither those skills not the fact knoledge me and specially guys like they have. Although you are wrong by thinking so, you feel you can't write and that's why you limit yourself to be a link-fixer and a blind reverser. Like the bird that eat the rhinoceros' ticks to keep it healthy.


 * So, now I get to hear from what must be the tenth time about my grand error I'm not telling you. I'm showing evidence. I didn't blind reverse. My info was copyedited.


 * I guess T-Man believes that rampant misspelling, poor grammar and sentence structure, all these are perfectly fine (because SOMEONE will clean up after him), but that a factuall error is a cardinal sin punishable, figuratively, by death, but actually, in wikipedia, by lifetime expulsion - Yep, DA is a nice little religion humanitarian kid... Nevermind this show of his dictatorship-barbarian skills that makes me wonder what kind of lovely satanic sect is he in (sorry about the sarcasm, I know this is totally out of place but his comments were too good to be true, I actually laughed to tears)... what he wrote right before, was a manipulated half-truth. The fact that I believe we should act as a comunity and help each other for the sake of the info, doesn't mean that I don't do my best when writting. For example, the info I wrote in Batman, the Bat-embargo, and Superman articles I copiedited in word. I love English and I'love writting and I love learning more. I only neglect my writting in talk pages, bot not always. Did I mention DA is also the developer of the meta-seriesterm for comics. Such development was so impresive that apparently nobody on internet or even on he world uses it or knows about, so he decides to make-up a whole article for it. Aparently he was making up the thing the whole time... Good thing his grammar was so neat.