Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Freedom skies/Evidence/Response to Sebastian Helm

Response to Sebastian Helm
Sir,

I have to register a protest against that staement.

You specifiaclly said

I'm not familiar with what led to Nina resignation, but from the spectacle I just witnessed I think it might be a good idea if both parties apologized to her.

Nina specifically stated that she "does not research thoroughly." That was the bone of contention. I worked hard on the article; Compare the number of citations before (the article didn't even have a references/notes section) and right after my involvement. I added most of those references in the Notes section.

Sir, you also said that

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-12-26_Decline_of_Buddhism_in_India#Attempts_and_proposals_to_calm_down_the_heat I asked Tigeroo (talk • contribs) just yesterday to explain his reason for the desired change, and instead of answering my question, he starts this war. I therefore revert to the old version.]

If the arbitrators will take a look here, in this most crucial of sections then they'll notice that Tigeroo specifically spoke that:-

So an invading army destroys your holy sites and religious monuments and you're content because they're "stamping their victory?"

If razing of Stupas and imposing of a head tax does not amount to persecution then what does?

Kindly keep personal opinons aside, I have additional sources if you'd like to ask for them.

That was the bone of contention. Not stating mere acts as they were and calling them "stamping the victory" based on personal opinion.

Having said that, Mr. Helm was ever accomadating to me and was most kind to me even when I was frustrated. I respect him and am immensely grateful for his kind behaviour.