Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/JarlaxleArtemis 2/Evidence

Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and be concise. Long, rambling, or stream-of-conciousness rants are not helpful.

As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use this form:.

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.

Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which illustrate behavior which relates to the issues.

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence in your own section and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.

Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.


 * What happened.
 * What happened.


 * What happened.
 * What happened.


 * What happened.
 * What happened.


 * What happened.
 * What happened.


 * What happened.
 * What happened.


 * What happened.
 * What happened.

Evidence presented by Psychonaut
Please refer to my opening statement for the evidence I have compiled. &mdash;Psychonaut 29 June 2005 15:57 (UTC)

Rebuttal of JarlaxleArtemis's opening statement
I reproduce the statement here with my annotations in red.

Psychonaut 03:32, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The edits on my user page concerning my high school teacher
 * She does not use Wikipedia. Irrelevant. He posted her e-mail address and encouraged others to harass her.
 * It is my own user page! I was under the impression that one could put anything one wants on their own user page. I believe he is lying here. He has been warned several times before (including in the last RfA) about inappropriate content on his user page.
 * Obscenities
 * I did not know that Wikipedia was a censored place. Again, JarlaxleArtemis seems to have a short memory. He has been warned before (including in the last RfA) about his personal attacks.
 * They are just words.
 * They weren't even directed at anyone. Another blatant lie.  The very first sentence of the edit he links to is directed specifically at User:Ann Heneghan.
 * I didn't vandalize User talk:Ann Heneghan. I left her a message expressing my opinion. Someone besides her removed it, so I put it back because I wanted her to see it. I see no expression of opinion in this edit; it seems like it's a blatant attempt to deface a user page with gratuitous swearing.  Even giving him the benefit of the doubt, I think he could have chosen a less confrontational and sensational way of expressing his "opinion".
 * Misinterpreted edit summary
 * I didn't call anyone an idiot. I merely said "revert idiocy." In other words, I called his edit idiotic, not him. Splitting hairs.  Regardless of whether JarlaxleArtemis meant to call the user or his actions idiotic, the statement is still a personal attack.
 * Even if JarlaxleArtemis is acquitted of wrongdoing in the above incidents, please note that they are only three in a much longer list presented in my opening statement and elsewhere on this evidence page.
 * Images
 * I did provide sources to those images.  Providing the source of the images is not an issue here; proving fair use or a free license is.  Simply citing the source does not grant Wikipedia a license to use an image.  JarlaxleArtemis has been instructed before (previous RfA) to familiarize himself with Wikipedia's copyright policies.  Evidently he has not done so.
 * What the fuck
 * I created this redirect to Help desk because I had just seen an admin create a redirect to Help desk titled Wtf! or something similar. JarlaxleArtemis is trying to use someone else's questionable behaviour to justify his own.
 * "Speedying" material
 * Contained no information whatsoever about the subject So mark it as a stub.
 * Was a copy of another article If this were true, he should have done a merge.  Instead, he tried to speedy with the  tag.
 * Initially marked as a "speedy." A few minutes later, I noticed my mistake and stated the reason for the "speedy" on Talk:Do You Know . I also tried to clean up the article as retribution after that.  JarlaxleArtemis did not notice and correct his mistake; User:Hoary did.
 * Contained a short list of dead links. It wasn't encyclopedic, so I marked it as a "speedy." So mark it as a stub.  JarlaxleArtemis should know by now that we have plenty of articles on music albums.
 * Just a list. Didn't explain what the heck the list was about, so I marked it as a "speedy." Ditto.
 * User page was created by an anon, so I marked it as a "speedy." Kelly Martin later told me to assume good faith. I agreed with her and realized that I had erred.
 * Marked the redirect page Gaels as a "speedy" because there was no need for it. Instead of inserting Gaels as a link, one can instead just as easily insert Gaels . Redirects are for user searches, not just article links.
 * The "deleting relevant material from Wikipedia" part of the accusation was actually pretty minor anyway. I'm more concerned about JarlaxleArtemis's pattern of personal attacks and the messes he creates for other users and admins by changing image copyright tags and/or uploading images with missing or incorrect tags.
 * Michael Jackson
 * Claims that Michael Jackson is a pedophile are widely supported and widely publicized. One merely has to read the newspaper and watch the news on television. If they're so widely supported, he should have been able to provide a cite.
 * "Crapflooding" various anon's talk pages
 * Was a mistake with my browser or something like that. I have already explained this on User talk:JarlaxleArtemis. I question the explanation on this talk page. I can see someone accidentally hitting the submit button a couple times, or even several times if the server doesn't seem to be responding, but over a hundred??
 * Sandbox and Linuxbeak
 * I didn't know that the "code" I added to the Sandbox would exploit browser vulnerabilities and cause them to lock up or crash. Heck, I didn't even add a code! I added a bunch of funny cartoon images. Disproved by User:Linuxbeak elsewhere on the evidence page.
 * Linuxbeak later blocked me for this edit to the Sandbox. I had no idea that adding 9 5/7 lines of the word "disruptive" to the Sandbox constituted a block.
 * I was outraged because of this unfair block, and "e-mail bombed" him because he deserved it. E-mailing is not part of Wikipedia, so it shouldn't even be included in this unjust case.   &mdash;   Jarlaxle   June 28, 2005 05:23 (UTC) So JarlaxleArtemis admits to harassing other Wikipedia users.  If this is done through e-mail or in person or in some other way outside Wikipedia, does this matter?  I think so.  I would hate to see valuable contributors such as User:Linuxbeak scared away from Wikipedia because other users are making life difficult for them.

Ongoing personal attacks
The following incidents occurred after this Request for Arbitration was initated but before it was concluded.
 * "Because you are an asshole. And I don't care if that's a fucking personal attack, asshole."
 * Calls anonymous user a "racist vandal" . The user in question was quite obviously a vandal, but nothing in their contributions history suggests that they are racist.  (They had replaced images on a number of unrelated pages and templates.)
 * "Like I give a damn, you fucking robot." in response to legitimate action taken against the fifth(!) violation of his temporary injunction.
 * Off-Wikipedia harassment of User:Linuxbeak
 * Mildly profane e-mail message sent to User:Psychonaut through the "E-mail Wikipedia user" function (contact me for a copy if required)
 * "Hi, my name's Linuxbeak, and I'm a fucking cunt" and various other taunting
 * Just a comment: I believe this actually comes from the banned troll MARMOT, and not Jarlaxle. It is completely possible that Jarlaxle pretended to be MARMOT, but an IP check would be required to determine the true originator of this. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 21:25, September 8, 2005 (UTC)

Images for deletion
This is to let the Arbitration Committee know that I have gone ahead and started to list some of JarlaxleArtemis's copyvio, duplicate, and superfluous images for deletion. I hope this is OK provided I mention the fact here; if not, let me know and I'll remove the deletion requests pending the end of the investigation. (I assumed there would be logs of any deletions which the arbitrators could examine if necessary.) Please see the respective entries on Images_and_media_for_deletion and Possibly unfree images. &mdash;Psychonaut 21:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Image:Jeremy Hanson in Tengwar Sindarin.png - UE
 * Image:Jarlaxle emoticon.png - UE CV
 * Image:Jeremy Hanson in Futhark.JPG - UE
 * Image:Moon.jpg - obsoleted by Image:Moon merged small.jpg
 * Image:Sephiroth.gif - UE
 * Image:Silly Dog.jpg - UE
 * Image:World of Final Fantasy VII.gif - OR, obsoleted by Image:Final Fantasy VII Map.jpg
 * Image:Wulfgar emoticon.png - UE OR CV
 * Image:Yevon-symbol emoticon.png - UE OR CV
 * Image:Yaddle.jpg - OR obsoleted by Image:New-Yaddle.jpg
 * Image:Attila_the_Hun.jpg - OR, duplicate of Image:Image:AttilaTheHun.jpg
 * Image:Ƣƣ.JPG - OR, obsoleted by Image:Ƣƣ.png
 * Image:Gaius Julius Caesar 2.png - OR, obsoleted by Image:Julius Caesar - Illustration from Cassell's History of England - Century Edition - published circa 1902.jpg
 * Image:Christina Aguilera.jpg - UE, OR, CV
 * Image:Bruenor_Battlehammer2.gif - obsoleted by Image:Bruenostreamofsilver.JPG
 * Image:Bruenor_Battlehammer.jpg - UE (we already have an image of this character), CV
 * Image:Laughter.gif - UE, OR
 * Image:Hannibal.png - OR, obsoleted by Image:Hannibal.jpg
 * Image:Solomon_W._Golomb.jpg - CV
 * Image:ParisHiltonDog.jpg - OR, NS

Evidence presented by Kelly Martin
I've run into this editor a few times while doing RC patrol. The following three edits were significant enough for me to feel the need to leave him notes on his talk page. Below are links to my warnings and to his edits which prompted the warnings.

June 22, 2005

 * warned for inappropriate use of the nonsense tag (I can't find the edit that prompted me to warn him about inappropriate edit summaries):, for

June 20, 2005

 * warned for taunting vandals:, for.

June 17, 2005

 * warned for marking a user's page for speedy delete inappropriately:, for.

Various dates
The edits below are other edits which I now deem suspicious which I found while documenting the above edits.
 * (mild personal attack)
 * (inappropriate language)
 * (technically harmful edit; note that attempting to view this edit crashes the differencing engine)
 * (insertion of a large amount of nonsense into a user talk page)
 * (insertion of a large amount of nonsense into a user talk page)

Evidence presented by Linuxbeak
The purpose of this page is to chronologically document the edits of User:JarlaxleArtemis that have been questionable and relevent to this Arbitration case.

Disclaimer
This is by no means a complete list. Jarlaxle has so many offenses that it would be a waste of time trying to come up with a exhaustive list. If I get the strength to do more posting, I will, but this list is rather incomplete at best.

8 June

 * 18:36, June 8, 2005
 * Posting the name and e-mail address of one of his high-school teachers with the instructions to e-mail her and "tell her what a bitch she is."
 * 18:37, June 8, 2005
 * Same as above after removal by another editor
 * 18:38, June 8, 2005
 * Same as above after removal by another editor
 * 19:35, June 8, 2005
 * Same as above after removal by another editor
 * 19:39, June 8, 2005
 * Same as above after removal by another editor
 * 19:44, June 8, 2005
 * Same as above after removal by another editor
 * Edit summary: (Well, she is.… And aren't I allowed to "vandalize" my own user page?)
 * 19:58, June 8, 2005
 * Same as above after removal by another editor
 * Edit summary: (It's my own user page, you MORON. I'm not stupid enough to share my goddamn password.)

17 June

 * 00:51, June 17, 2005
 * Taunting of vandal
 * 00:52, June 17, 2005
 * Marks user page as speedy
 * 00:57, June 17, 2005
 * Warned against inappropriate usage of speedy deletion tag on userpages

18 June

 * 19:03, June 18, 2005
 * Insertion of a large amount of nonsense into a user talk page
 * 19:05, June 18, 2005
 * Insertion of a large amount of nonsense into a user talk page

19 June

 * 21:06, June 19, 2005
 * Inappropriate language
 * 21:30, June 19, 2005
 * Personal attacks
 * Technically harmful edit; note that attempting to view this edit crashes the differencing engine
 * Technically harmful edit; note that attempting to view this edit crashes the differencing engine

20 June

 * 00:33, June 20, 2005
 * Warned against taunting vandals and trolls
 * 18:59, June 20, 2005
 * Defends usage of mooning gif
 * Violation of assume good faith
 * Violation of no personal attacks
 * 19:15, June 20, 2005
 * Changes the attribute of a personal attack comment instead of removing it
 * Violation of no personal attacks
 * Did not remove the personal attack
 * 19:16, June 20, 2005
 * Continues to defend questionable GIF
 * Trollish behavior
 * Bad Wikiquette
 * 19:35, June 20, 2005
 * Inappropriate usage of speedy deletion tag
 * Does not comply with deletion policy
 * Does not comply with speedy deletion policy
 * 19:38, June 20, 2005
 * Spamming of mooning gif on sandbox (WARNING: VIEWING THIS DIFF MAY CRASH X-SERVERS
 * This is destructive disruption.
 * 19:40, June 20, 2005
 * Same as above
 * This is destructive disruption.
 * 19:51, June 20, 2005
 * Acknowledges warning to not post GIFs on sandbox again
 * Acknowledgement indicates understanding of situation; he is no longer "ignorant" of damage he caused
 * 19:54, June 20, 2005
 * ...and instead links to the sandbox with his destructive edit
 * Deliberately attempts to crash servers of users
 * 20:02, June 20, 2005
 * Posts destructive link again; states "For a chance at crashing your server, click here. It's worth it, though, as you will see a picture of a beautiful woman."
 * Deliberately attempts to crash servers of users; lies as well
 * 20:12, June 20, 2005
 * Inappropriate warning a user
 * Biting of a newcomer
 * Trollish behavior
 * 20:13, June 20, 2005
 * Spamming of test (warning) template
 * Biting of a newcomer
 * Trollish behavior
 * 20:19, June 20, 2005
 * Edited Michael Jackson article, edit summary "revert bias"
 * Inappropriate edit summary
 * 20:23, June 20, 2005
 * Posts destructive link to sandbox again
 * Deliberately attempts to crash servers of users
 * 20:30, June 20, 2005
 * Removed warning by administrator to stop posting destructive link; edit summary "revert nonsense"
 * Indicates contempt in face of warnings
 * 20:32, June 20, 2005
 * Removes signatures in sandbox; this edit wasn't the problem, but stated in edit summary "Why do you care what happens to other people's computers?"
 * Indicates contempt and malice towards other users
 * 20:36, June 20, 2005
 * Posts misleading User talk alert box
 * Disruptive edits; was asked to stop several times
 * 20:37, June 20, 2005
 * Same as above; was reverted
 * Disruptive edits; was asked to stop several times
 * 20:41, June 20, 2005
 * Continues to work on message box
 * Disruptive edits; was asked to stop several times
 * 20:42, June 20, 2005
 * Posts again; was reverted
 * Disruptive edits; was asked to stop several times
 * 20:43, June 20, 2005
 * Posts on my user talk page; states "You can't block me for merely editing the sandbox." (FYI, I can, but that wasn't the reason for his block)
 * Indicates contempt towards his actions
 * 20:44, June 20, 2005
 * Removes warnings on talk page again
 * Indicates contempt towards administrators despite warnings
 * 20:45, June 20, 2005
 * Sandbox with Talk page alert again
 * Disruptive edits; was asked to stop several times
 * Removes warnings on talk page, edit summary "revert nonsense
 * Indicates contempt towards administrators despite warnings
 * 20:49, June 20, 2005
 * Sandbox with Talk page alert third time
 * Disruptive edits; was asked to stop several times
 * '''20:54, June 20, 2005
 * Spites administrators; last straw.
 * User was blocked for 24 hours following this. User kept trying to log in more than 15 times after block (yes, I watched and counted); reset block for more than 3 hours past original deadline.
 * 20:57, Jun 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button

X-Gmail-Received: a461a0ce142ee0e5d6daba1c73b02793ee53f761 Delivered-To: linuxbeak@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.86.10 with SMTP id j10cs75779nzb; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.96.3 with SMTP id t3mr95165wrb; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path:  Received: from mail.wikimedia.org (zwinger.wikimedia.org [207.142.131.234]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 64si2744834wra.2005.06.20.17.57.36; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com: best guess record for domain of wiki@wikimedia.org designates 207.142.131.234 as permitted sender) Received: from srv20.pmtpa.wmnet (srv20.pmtpa.wmnet [10.0.2.20] by mail.wikimedia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFCE1190B5B for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from srv20.pmtpa.wmnet (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by srv20.pmtpa.wmnet (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5L0vZ8e032507 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:57:35 GMT Received: (from apache@localhost) by srv20.pmtpa.wmnet (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5L0vZIK032506; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:57:35 GMT Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:57:35 GMT Message-Id: <200506210057.j5L0vZIK032506@srv20.pmtpa.wmnet> X-Authentication-Warning: srv20.pmtpa.wmnet: apache set sender to wiki@wikimedia.org using -f To: Linuxbeak  Subject: Wikipedia e-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit From: JarlaxleArtemis  X-Mailer: MediaWiki interuser e-mailer

Why did you block me? I stopped being disruptive! That's under my own user space!

X-Gmail-Received: f8fd1a95d069ac6727df5942fdc1c79b24e266cd Delivered-To: linuxbeak@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.86.10 with SMTP id j10cs75919nzb; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.23.8 with SMTP id 8mr1549515wrw; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path:  Received: from mail.wikimedia.org (zwinger.wikimedia.org [207.142.131.234]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 27si8819725wrl.2005.06.20.18.05.27; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com: best guess record for domain of wiki@wikimedia.org designates 207.142.131.234 as permitted sender) Received: from srv22.pmtpa.wmnet (srv22.pmtpa.wmnet [10.0.2.22]) by mail.wikimedia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D661F1190B55 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from srv22.pmtpa.wmnet (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by srv22.pmtpa.wmnet (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5L15QED002516 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:05:26 GMT Received: (from apache@localhost) by srv22.pmtpa.wmnet (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5L15QYN002515; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:05:26 GMT Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:05:26 GMT Message-Id: <200506210105.j5L15QYN002515@srv22.pmtpa.wmnet> X-Authentication-Warning: srv22.pmtpa.wmnet: apache set sender to wiki@wikimedia.org using -f To: Linuxbeak  Subject: Wikipedia e-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit From: JarlaxleArtemis  X-Mailer: MediaWiki interuser e-mailer
 * 21:05, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button

How is typing "disruptive" a few times in the Sandbox disruptive? What does it disrupt? No one.

X-Gmail-Received: 3f8db146bf169fd691fd5f6c73a95c575722fbfb Delivered-To: linuxbeak@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.86.10 with SMTP id j10cs75963nzb; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.106.2 with SMTP id e2mr3011636wrc; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path:  Received: from mail.wikimedia.org (zwinger.wikimedia.org [207.142.131.234]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 29si6574095wrl.2005.06.20.18.08.09; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com: best guess record for domain of wiki@wikimedia.org designates 207.142.131.234 as permitted sender) Received: from rabanus.pmtpa.wmnet (rabanus.pmtpa.wmnet [10.0.0.15]) by mail.wikimedia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851591190B53 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rabanus.pmtpa.wmnet (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rabanus.pmtpa.wmnet (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5L186sq029071 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:08:06 GMT Received: (from apache@localhost) by rabanus.pmtpa.wmnet (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j5L186Rl029070; Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:08:06 GMT Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 01:08:06 GMT Message-Id: <200506210108.j5L186Rl029070@rabanus.pmtpa.wmnet> X-Authentication-Warning: rabanus.pmtpa.wmnet: apache set sender to wiki@wikimedia.org using -f To: Linuxbeak  Subject: Wikipedia e-mail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit From: JarlaxleArtemis  X-Mailer: MediaWiki interuser e-mailer
 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button
 * NOTE: I am only going to post this message once, because it was the same thing over and over and over. No need to spam more than is necessary.

FUCKER


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:08, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:09, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:10, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:13, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:13, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:13, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:13, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:13, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:13, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:13, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:14, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:15, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:16, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button


 * 21:17, June 20, 2005
 * E-Mail sent via E-Mail this user button

21 June

 * 23:29, June 21, 2005
 * Inappropriate usage of nonsense tag
 * 23:32, June 21, 2005
 * Is warned by another administrator against using misleading edit summaries
 * Less than 24 hours after his unblocking

8 August

 * 13:36, August 8, 2005
 * Linuxbeak blocked "User:JarlaxleArtemis" with an expiry time of 24 hours (Violation of temporary injunction as ruled by ArbCom)

9 August

 * 22:13, August 9, 2005
 * Linuxbeak blocked "User:JarlaxleArtemis" with an expiry time of 24 hours (Violation of temporary injunction, again)

11 August

 * 21:38, August 11, 2005
 * Linuxbeak blocked "User:JarlaxleArtemis" with an expiry time of 24 hours (Third time violation of Temporary Injunction)


 * 23:30, August 11, 2005
 * Linuxbeak blocked "User:JarlaxleArtemis" with an expiry time of 1 week (Extended block per suggestion of Arbitrator via IRC for thrice breaking temp injunction)

14 August

 * 11:20, August 14, 2005
 * Linuxbeak blocked "User:JarlaxleArtemis" with an expiry time of 1 week (Once again, violating his temporary injunction; lengthened block has been authorized)

27 August

 * 10:12, August 27, 2005
 * Linuxbeak blocked JarlaxleArtemis with an expiry time of 1 week (Fifth violation of temporary injunction; lengthened block has been authorized)

Evidence presented by Philwelch
Of all the people affected by JarlaxleArtemis, I really wasn't affected all that much. In summary, he made a poorly-thought-out reversion to the article Darth Vader (with an abusive edit summary) that I reverted. This is no big deal, as at the time, I spent most of my time on Wikipedia reverting poorly-thought-out edits to that article. I was at the time (and still am) trying to get it to featured article status.

A little upset by his abusive edit summary and wanting to remind him that he is dealing with other people on Wikipedia, I went ahead and left a message on his talk page. He apparently didn't get the point.

8 June

 * 19:50, 8 June 2005
 * User reverted one of my good-faith edits to the article Darth Vader. . His edit summary read "revert idiocy", but it was his edit in my opinion that was the more destructive, as it pretty much screwed up the inherent spoiler issue with that page (as you can see).
 * 20:36, 8 June 2005
 * I replied on his talk page, calling him on his lack of tactfulness and explaining the rationale behind my "idiotic" edit. My intent was to remind him that the other editors on Wikipedia are people too, so maybe if he got a real live response from one he might get the point.

9 June

 * 17:01, 9 June 2005
 * Sadly, he didn't get the point, and responded abusively to me.


 * 17:04, 9 June 2005
 * Minor edit to abusive response.

Evidence presented by Y0u
I would merely like to point out the following message that the user sent me:

14 June

 * When I asked the user to explain this message at, I never recieved a reply. I believe that it was in response to my warning , which was in response to the users three removals (and my restorations) of the ifd tag to [Image:Moon.gif] (, , and .)

Note by CesarB
The Sandbox got moved and deleted; it has been restored at Sandbox/history. See Votes for undeletion. --cesarb 9 July 2005 07:41 (UTC)

12 July 2005

 * Marks page being used as evidence in this RFAr for speedy deletion. --Tabor 20:21, 12 July 2005 (UTC)