Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/K1/Evidence

Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please choose an appropriate header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Please do this under a seperate header, to seperate your response from the original evidence.

Be aware that the arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent.

personal abuse on edit summaries + revert warring
 

personal abuse on talk pages
the current talk page is edited to cover up the abuse 

''I hope the above is sufficient at the moment. Further analysis of teh history shows him also deleting comments he has not liked on his talk page etc Refdoc 19:00, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)

From Azerbaijani articles:

Antonio's comments
Its been such a long time since me and K1 had an argument..but I do have good news, I just saved a whole bunch of money by switching to Geico..lol j/k. I found some evidence, here it is: I need a source for this claim made by K1, specially the suicide mission part: The US never admitted any wrongdoing or responsibility in this tragedy, never apologized, and furthermore, blamed the Iranians for it, as according to the US account of this tragedy, the Iranian commercial jetliner "appeared to be on a suicide mission". Roozbeh 14:25, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Plus, as far as I remember from Puerto Rican newspapers, President Reagan DID send an apology, to the stuff of "this is a senseless tragedy and the American people extend our condolences to all of Iran" or something like that. Antonio Politically INcorrect...so who cares? Martin

and this is why puerto rican papers and magazines should just stick to salsa and merengue and stay out of politics. not only did usa never apologize, the reagan administration never even admitted the slightest gilt in the whole tragedy. in fact george shcultz, then Secretary of State, said openly and shamelessly [i am paraphrasing here, as i can't remember the quote verbatim] "the responisibility for this incident is fully with the iranian side who were not responding to our numerous queries ...." -- an ourageous lie. as if that wasn't shameful enough, a US federal court rejected the legitimacy of lawsuits and compensation efforts for the families of the victims, on the grounds that this was part of a "war situation" and therefore US law disqualifies such claims on that basis!! now you would think this is unspeakable shamelessness? it gets even worse. they allowed law suits to be filed by families of "non-iranian" victims of that flight because their respective countries were not participants in a war that relates to this case. and for your information, later on, will rogers, the commander of that ship, was decorated for his bravery and dedication to his country!! some brave man. --K1 08:33, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC) Thanks and God bless you! "Antonio Pineapple Martin"