Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kingofmann/Proposed decision

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other Arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop, Arbitrators may place proposals which are ready for voting here. Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain. Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed. Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed. Only Arbitrators or Clerks should edit this page; non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

For this case, there are 12 active Arbitrators, so 7 votes are a majority.

Motions and requests by the parties
Place those on /Workshop. Motions which are accepted for consideration and which require a vote will be placed here by the Arbitrators for voting. Motions have the same majority for passage as the final decision.

Motion to dismiss
1) Events have overtaken this case, and the community can take care of this entire issue itself -- and is doing so. Therefore, I move to dismiss this case.


 * Support:
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 07:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * James F. (talk) 12:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * FloNight (talk) 14:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree that the case appears to be moot given recent events, including the deletion of the disputed article and the departure of User:Kingofmann from Wikipedia. If problems recur at a substantial level, which I hope they will not, a reopening can be sought. Newyorkbrad (talk) 15:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Kirill 18:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Sam Blacketer (talk) 18:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 *  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 23:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
1)

{text of proposed motion}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Proposed temporary injunctions
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support") 24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

Template
1)

{text of proposed orders}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

=Proposed final decision=

Template
1) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
2) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
3) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
4) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
5) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
6) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
7) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
8) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
9) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
10) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
3) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
4) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
5) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
6) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
7) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
8) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
9) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
10) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
11) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
3) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
4) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
5) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
6) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
7) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
8) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
9) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
10) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
11) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
12) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
13) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
3) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
4) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Implementation notes
''Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.''

Vote
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support") 24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.