Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Licorne/Workshop

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of /Evidence here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies. Anyone who edits should sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on /Proposed decision.

Template
1)


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1)


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

=Proposed final decision=

Template
1) {text of proposed principle}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

No Original Resarch
No Original Research is an official policy of Wikipedia.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Civility
Wikipedia editors are expected to be civil. Civility is necessary for the development of consensus that supports the development of an encyclopedia.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Original Research
The ArbCom finds that Licorne has engaged in original research.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:
 * I think this needs to be reformulated. Doing original research by itself is not a problem, it only becomes a problem when one tries to get it into Wikipedia. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * "has engaged in original research and attempted to use Wikipedia to publish the results"? I think that's what a violation of WP:NOR amounts to; the original version might be a shorthand for that. --Alvestrand 10:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Incivility
The ArbCom finds that Licorne has been uncivil.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Contempt for Dispute Resolution
The ArbCom finds that Licorne has showed contempt for the dispute resolution process.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

One-Year Ban
Licorne is banned from Wikipedia for one year for original research, disruption, and disregard of the community and its processes.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Probation
Licorne is placed on Probation indefinitely. Any admin may ban him from any article that he disrupts.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Analysis of evidence
Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

Template

 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

General discussion

 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others: