Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Workshop

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of /Evidence here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies, Arbitrators will vote at /Proposed decision. Anyone who edits should sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on /Proposed decision.

Template
1)


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1)


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1)


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1)


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1)


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1)


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1)


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Questions to the parties
=Proposed final decision=

No personal attacks
1) Personal attacks are expressly prohibited because they make Wikipedia a hostile environment for editors, and thereby damage Wikipedia both as an encyclopedia (by losing valued contributors) and as a wiki community (by discouraging reasoned discussion). Wikipedia editors should conduct their relationship with other editors with courtesy, and must avoid responding in kind when personally attacked.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:
 * Proposed. Taken from WP:RFAR/HWY &mdash; Selmo  (talk) 04:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a battleground
2) Wikipedia is a reference work. Use of the site for political struggle accompanied by harassment of opponents is extremely disruptive.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Copied from Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Proposed decision to allow for comment. Paul August &#9742; 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Wikipedia is not a soapbox
3) The use of Wikipedia for political propaganda is prohibited.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Copied from Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Proposed decision to allow for comment. Paul August &#9742; 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Courtesy
4) Wikipedia users are expected to behave reasonably and calmly in their dealings with other users. Insulting and intimidating other users harms the community by creating a hostile environment. Personal attacks are not acceptable.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Copied from Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Proposed decision to allow for comment. Paul August &#9742; 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Sockpuppets
5) Abuse of sockpuppet accounts, such as using them to evade blocks, bans, and user accountability–and especially to make personal attacks or reverts, or vandalize–is strictly forbidden. See Sockpuppets.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Copied from Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Proposed decision to allow for comment. Paul August &#9742; 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Tendentious editing
6) Users who disrupt the editing of articles by engaging in sustained aggressive point of view editing may be banned from the affected articles. In extreme cases they may be banned from the site.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Copied from Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Proposed decision to allow for comment. Paul August &#9742; 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Disruptive editing
7) Users who engage in disruptive editing may be banned from the site.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Copied from Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Proposed decision to allow for comment. Paul August &#9742; 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Lukas19 was Thulean
1) edited fomerly under the account


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Proposed. Paul August &#9742; 17:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:
 * As a pure matter of form, this could be made an apposition in the paragraph introducing Lukas19. Viz.: "Lukas19, who was formerly known as Thulean, edits almost...."  It needn't be a separately paragraphed finding. Newyorkbrad 16:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

LSLM
2) has a history of disruptive behavior including edit-warring, sockpuppetry , political soapboxing , attempting to turn Wikipedia into a battleground along national lines , and personal attacks.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Copied from Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Proposed decision to allow for comment. Paul August &#9742; 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Lukas19
3) edits almost exclusively on topics related to race, and has an extensive history of tendentious edit-warring there.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Copied from Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Proposed decision to allow for comment. Paul August &#9742; 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

LSLM banned
1) LSLM is banned from editing for 30 days for repeated personal attacks.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:
 * Proposed. &mdash; Selmo  (talk) 04:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

LSLM placed on personal attack parole
1) LSLM is placed on standard personal attack parole for one year. If any edit made by LSLM which is judged by any administrator to be a personal attack, he may be briefly blocked, up to one week. After five blocks, the lengh shall be increased to one year.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:
 * Proposed. &mdash; Selmo  (talk) 04:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

LSLM banned
2) is banned from Wikipedia for a period of one year.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Copied from Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Proposed decision to allow for comment. Paul August &#9742; 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Lukas19 banned
3) is banned from Wikipedia for a period of one year.


 * Comment by Arbitrators:
 * Copied from Requests for arbitration/Lukas19-LSLM/Proposed decision to allow for comment. Paul August &#9742; 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Analysis of evidence
Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

Template

 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template

 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template

 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template

 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template

 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template

 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

Template

 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others:

General discussion

 * Comment by Arbitrators:


 * Comment by parties:


 * Comment by others: