Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/New World Translation/Proposed decision

After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other Arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop, Arbitrators may place proposals which are ready for voting here. Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain. Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed. Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed. Only Arbitrators or Clerks should edit this page; non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.

For this case, there are 13 active Arbitrators (excluding 1 who is recused), so 7 votes are a majority.

Proposed motions
Arbitrators may place proposed motions affecting the case in this section for voting. Typical motions might be to close or dismiss a case without a full decision (a reason should normally be given), or to add an additional party (although this can also be done without a formal motion as long as the new party is on notice of the case). Suggestions by the parties or other non-arbitrators for motions or other requests should be placed on the /Workshop page for consideration and discussion. Motions have the same majority for passage as the final decision.

Motion to dismiss
1) The party who filed this request for arbitration has not edited Wikipedia in two weeks, and no evidence has been presented although the case has been open for one week. Based on discussion on the case page and the editing history of the article, it appears that the underlying dispute may have been resolved. Accordingly, this case is dismissed. If serious disputes recur, an application to reopen the case may be made on Requests for arbitration.

Passed on 04:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Support:
 * Proposed. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:38, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Kirill 23:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Nothing doing. Sam Blacketer (talk) 23:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 05:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 13:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Paul August &#9742; 18:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * FT2 (Talk 01:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Proposed temporary injunctions
A temporary injunction is a directive from the Arbitration Committee that parties to the case, or other editors notified of the injunction, do or refrain from doing something while the case is pending.

Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support") 24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.

Template
1)

{text of proposed orders}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

=Proposed final decision=

Template
1) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
2) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
3) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
4) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
5) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
6) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
7) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
8) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
9) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
10) {text of proposed principle}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
3) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
4) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
5) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
6) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
7) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
8) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
9) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
10) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
11) {text of proposed finding of fact}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Proposed remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template
1) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
2) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
3) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
4) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
5) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
6) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
7) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
8) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
9) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
10) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
11) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
12) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
13) {text of proposed remedy}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
1) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
2) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
3) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Template
4) {text of proposed enforcement}


 * Support:


 * Oppose:


 * Abstain:

Implementation notes
''Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.''

Vote
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support") 24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.