Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Scientology/Evidence/By White Cat

Introduction
This is a hard case to collect evidence on.
 * You have a group of people who are motivated by their belief that Scientology is the worst thing since Plan 9 from Outer Space.
 * You have another group that believes Scientology is the best thing since sliced bread.
 * You have yet another group, the moderates, who are not neutral yet they do not go to either extremes.

People are strongly motivated (some much more than others) by their points of views to say the least. Everyone believes they are within policy and can easily quote policies supporting this.

That said most of the dispute is over the content which you will not see in the evidence as content issues are beyond the scope of this and any RFAR. Due to this, the evidence will primarily focus on user conduct.

-- Cat chi? 18:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Multiple revert wars

 * 1) Involved users revert wared on multiple Scientology related articles

User:Bravehartbear

 * User is quite inactive. User makes few short bursts of edits that are sometimes months apart. User has fewer than 500 (430 according to the tool) article namespace edits.
 * All of users article namespace edits concentrate on a few Scientology related articles namely:
 * Lisa McPherson
 * Bennetta Slaughter
 * Bob Minton
 * Scientology
 * Volunteer Ministers
 * Scientology beliefs and practices
 * Auditing (Scientology)
 * Purification Rundown