Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Trey Stone and Davenbelle/Evidence/Corporate media

On December 7, 2005 created Corporate media citing no authority. On December 26th made his first edit  which describes News Corporation, owner of Fox News as "right-wing," citing no source, placing "news" in quotes and removing the link to Radicalism associated with Noam Chomsky. He then replaced the link to those who purportedly use the term "corporate media" from leftists ( leftists to progressives (redirects to Political progressivism) again citing no authority . Trey Stone then reverted all changes to the article (some not by Davenbelle) with the comment "WTF happened" . Trey Stone then added liberals to leftists as those alleged to use the term "corporate media," again without citing a source . At this point I checked Talk:Corporate media to see how the conversation about these edits was going at that point and found the page blank after about 500 hotly contested edits and dozens of reversions. Davenbelle reverts, adding a link to propaganda model "that explains this systematic bias." again citing no authority.

At his point I googled "Corporate media" and got 600,000 hits, adding "Noam Chomsky" yields 50,000, adding "propaganda model" yields 1000, see The Propaganda Model: A Retrospective by Edward S. Herman.

After some back and forth copyedits from a leftist perspective. Trey Stone reverts. Davenbelle reverts to Viejero's version with the comment "npov". Trey Stone reverts without comment. Davenbelle reverts. Trey Stone reverts. Davenbelle reverts. Trey Stone reverts with comment. Davenbelle reverts. Trey Stone reverts. Davenbelle reverts. Trey Stone reverts. Davenbelle reverts. Trey Stone reverts. Davenbelle reverts. Trey Stone reverts. Viajero reverts, copyedits. Trey Stone reverts. Davenbelle reverts. Trey Stone reverts. Davenbelle reverts. Trey Stone reverts. Trey Stone reverts. Davenbelle reverts. Heh, at this point I lost track. The current article is Davenbelle's version, having been reverted dozens of times with little discussion.