Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Wareware/Evidence

Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and be concise. Long, rambling, or stream-of-conciousness rants are not helpful.

As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use this form:.

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.

Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which illustrate behavior which relates to the issues.

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence in your own section and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.

Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.

Evidence presented by deeceevoice
The format of the following information may not conform exactly to the template provided. However, in order to avoid duplicating information already presented elsewhere, I've simply copied for your consideration the following documentation from the RfC/Wareware that preceded this RfA.

Evidence of disputed behavior (excerpted from RfC/Wareware)
It starts at Talk:Race/Archive 14, beginning here []: a disagreement between User:Wareware and User:Deeceevoice regarding whether ancient Egyptians were black.


 * 22:16, 14 Dec 2004, first racist innuendo from User:Wareware, who incorrectly assumes deeceevoice is a man:
 * It's wrong to say that people always cared about color when talking about Egypt. True egyptian researchers don't, but white supremacists do. (google white history if you're too dumb to differentiate between the two) ... Anyway, I guess your favorite site is this Buddha, the earliest Chinese, Egyptians, Indians, and Beethoven were all "negroid". Must make your balls feel big :)


 * 22:54, 14 Dec 2004, User:Deeceevoice goes along with Wareware's mistaken assumption and responds by "signifyin'" (see definition below):
 * Man, you better stop talkin' from up under my clothes! LOL! You're an ASIAN, and you wanna talk about the size of someone's balls? ROFLMBAO.... I think you'd better leave THAT one alone, my misguided Asian brother. This "discussion" has reached a new low. I'mma do you a favor and pretend we never had this exchange.


 * Main Entry: sig·ni·fy·ing
 * Pronunciation: 'sig-n&-"fI-i[ng]
 * Function: noun
 * Date: 1959
 * - a good-natured needling or goading especially among urban blacks by means of indirect gibes and clever often preposterous put-downs; also : DOZENS - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary


 * 23:36, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC), User:Wareware:
 * Also, I've read that blacks like to show off their presumed virility because of an inferiority complex that they got nothing "man-made" (civilization, architecture, literature, philosophy...etc) that can rival those of other "races." Hey, at least the asian balls don't smell as bad as apes' right? Oooops, was that racist?


 * 00:36, 15 Dec 2004, User:Deeceevoice:
 * Aw-w-w-w, I know, I know. There, there (patting this tortured soul on the head). You're just showin' your true colors, aincha, bwoi? But you can't really expect me to be offended by such hackneyed crap! I've been called far worse by far better than you, child ... You ain't stoo-pid; you're simply mentally and spiritually crippled. Better tend to yasself!


 * 01:38, 15 Dec 2004 User:Wareware:
 * If you truly are the more educated representative of your race, then I'm not really surprised that african-americans still generate the worst statistics than any other group in america.


 * 02:39, 15 Dec 2004 User:Deeceevoice disengages from the discussion:
 * Wareware, you've demonstrated yourself all along to be a mental cretin and a low-minded racist; you just finally came out and said what has been on your mind all along. So, now there's no need for me to be civil any longer. I got nothin' else to say to you. Stay obstinately ignorant and lost, you pathetically hateful fool. I will not address you again; as far as I'm concerned, you don't exist. You're not worthy of my attention, not even my contempt -- and certainly not of a single additional nanosecond of my time. (whistlin' as I show u my back)


 * 03:08, 15 Dec 2004, User:Wareware:
 * Wow, you just labelled me a racist right after I said you might do so and I don't think you can prove my point any better.


 * 00:37, 16 Dec 2004; when User:Deeceevoice doesn't respond, User:Wareware tries to keep it going:
 * Come on, you can at least make one "yo mama" response to show your quick wit, no? Or did that really hit you, and you can't think of anything logical, and then said I'm not worthy of your attention? Calling people racists and then shut them out while "whistlin' away" really seem to be in the vogue nowadays.

After Deeceevoice leaves the Race article and discussion, Wareware also leaves. From Dec 16 until Feb 10, Wareware posts only 54 times. Then on Feb 10, he starts up the dispute with Deeceevoice again, by putting the "totally disputed" tag on Afrocentrism, an article he has not edited before, and which DC started editing on Feb 7. ; then he tries to engage DC on the talk page.


 * 11:17, 11 Feb 2005, she refuses to discuss with him:
 * Wareware, you're the epitome of opinionated ignorance. You already know full well I have no intention of engaging you in dialogue ...

About the time of the exchange between Wareware and deeceevoice on melanin, Wareware surfaces for the first time on another talk page where deeceevoice is a participant. This time, the subject is African American. Under discussion is whether someone's insertion of crime statistics has a place in the article and, if so, in what context. This discussion thread is particularly pertinent in that Wareware displays a pronounced anti-black animus totally outside the context of any interaction whatsoever with user deeceevoice. Here, the two never exchange words; yet Wareware is antagonistic and sarcastic.
 * 03:20, 18 Feb 2005
 * Insitutional racism? Why not just add a section on "blame whitey"?

Participation in this discussion thread is open-minded and diverse. Wareware's comment is treated dismissively. He responds:
 * 20:47, 18 Feb 2005
 * Oh really? I'd rather listen to what Ward Connely and Bill Cosby have to say about it than some liberal PC-police who like to taut the culture of dependent victimhood. Oh look, we're all really poor and innocent victims exploited by the system have a laugh [www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1340801/posts] and

Another participant, User: Jmabel, responds with a link to an article by Camille Cosby on "Prejudice Permeates American Culture." Wareware:
 * 00:04, 19 Feb 2005
 * Yeah I'm sure America teaches ppl to kill blacks (http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=2884) Really ludicrous. And yes I brought up Cosby because he said something the liberals wouldnt say, like stop portraying black criminals as "political prisoners."

The same forum participant responds, "Wareware's choice of source speaks for itself." Apparently, seeing other participants will challenge him, Wareware moves on.


 * 05:41, 14 Feb 2005, Wareware turns up at Talk:Melanin, an article he hasn't edited before, and comments on additions by deeceevoice regarding the role of melanin in social and race bias. He truncates it drastically, stating:
 * Did a clean up of this "verbal diarrhea".


 * 03:57 8 March 2005, Wareware resurfaces at Talk: Cool (aesthetic).
 * Don't bother arguing with deeceevoice. Just look at his discussions and edits on Afrocentrism and you'll know that you can't get anything "un-racist" through his glued head.


 * 18:41, 8 Mar 2005, Talk:Melanin: A previous user (the author of the phrase "verbal diarrhea," and who later apologizes for his "rant") has written, "The section on social and rase bias is psychotic. It's about as relevant to an article on melanin as a lengthy discussion of the biochemical properties of melanin." Wareware follows suit:
 * Why the hell would we need to have a lengthy description of what racism, racialism, black supremacy, white supremacy, all sorts of "caste" system on a page on melanin the biological molecule? What's this crap?

deeceevoice responds that the article is about melanin, generally -- not just as a "biological molecule" -- and that brief mention of the role of melanin-based color bias in human societies in a meaningful way that directs users to other related subjects is pertinent. Wareware continues to disagree and makes a number of reverts without carefully reading the text and in some cases simply automatically repeatedly reverts self-edits by deeceevoice, including her correction of a typo. Deeceevoice reverts Wareware's edits; this is now an edit war focusing primarily on WW's objections to inclusion of material in a section on melanin in social and race bias. He repeatedly complains of other articles to which deeceevoice has contributed on matters of race.
 * 03:40, 9 Mar 2005, Wareware:
 * I don't think anything can get through your thick skull that's so preoccupied with race, racism, racialism, and all sorts of related crap.


 * 07:11, 9 Mar 2005, Wareware:
 * Hear that deeceevoice? Oh my god! Big Black Momma is coming to report me for suspension! Holy jesus I'd better run.


 * 11:31, 9 Mar 2005, Deeceevoice asks him to focus on content:
 * I could bring up all kinds of garbage here about your conduct and your racist remarks. But I won't. Try to focus, Wareware ...


 * 16:56, 9 Mar 2005, Wareware:
 * The only remotely racist remark I've made so far is the one on africans and apes, and that's after you made a fool of yourself by saying Asians have small penises [a mischaracterization of Deeceevoice's actual comment] ... That was a long time ago and you're kidding yourself if you say you can bring up all kinds of my purported racist conduct.


 * 19:19, 10 Mar 2005, Wareware requests mediation regarding Melanin


 * 18:51, 11 Mar 2005, Wareware continues on Talk:Melanin:
 * ... unless you tell me that blacks are discriminated against because they have thick lips ... Really, why is your skull so thick? Why insist on inserting so many references to racism? Are you on a crusade or something? This is not black-o-pedia ...


 * 19:00, 11 March 2005, Wareware drops user Jiang a note, requesting protection for Melanin:
 * hiya Jiang, I've been in a revert war with a pathetic Afrocentrist for quite a while.... This person is a total nutcase preoccupied with race....

User:Jiang complies, the article is protected from further edits and remains protected as of this writing. The version that is sustained is Wareware's.


 * Deeceevoice makes her first contribution to Black supremacy, and Wareware follows. March 13, Wareware turns up at Black supremacy, an article he has not edited before.  At 00:58, March 2005:
 * He makes an extensive, somewhat clumsy edit, remarking in the edit summary: "npoved a bit and streamlined the pseudoscience crap in this pile of an article."


 * In another edit which immediately follows, he all but completely deletes a substantive examination of the nature of black supremacy contrasted with white supremacy, including a quote by celebrated author and social commentator author bell hooks (contributed long before by another user), calling it variously "apologist drivel," "meaningless drivel." At 01:22, 13 Mar 2005:
 * Wareware remarks in the edit summary, "deleted meaningless drivel"




 * 03:49, 13 Mar 2005, Deeceevoice on Talk:Black supremacy again tries not to engage with him:
 * Still stalking me, eh? ... I won't have any other comment on your response on this matter, or on any other matter, until you learn to engage in civil discourse.


 * 05:48, 13 Mar 2005, Wareware:
 * Teach me civil discourse will you, eh? Try looking into a mirror and see if you can see a savage yourself.


 * 01:21, 14 Mar 2005, Deeceevoice:
 * I do not presume to teach you anything; frankly, I've begun to doubt that you are even marginally trainable. "Savage"? I have responded, civilly and with specific information ...


 * 04:59, 14 Mar 2005, Wareware:
 * Is your reading comprehension way below average or do you need somebody to take the jungle out of you?


 * 05:21, 14 Mar 2005, Wareware leaves a note on User talk:Deglr6328, saying he "can't stand" Deeceevoice.


 * 13:41, 16 Mar 2005, Deeceevoice on Talk:Black supremacy:
 * The very idea that black folks -- the "lowest of the low" -- to whom racist, soul-sick, pathetic mental cretins like Wareware refer using "ape," "savage" and "jungle" references would consider themselves superior to white folks just enrages and outrages them ... it really pulls the sheets off. 'S crackin' me up ...


 * 19:00, 17 Mar 2005, Wareware:
 * Give me a break, you pathetic louse. Black supremacy, just like any kind of supremacy, should enrage people and not to be diminished by reverse racism and whitewashing. You gotta be a fucking racist if you think otherwise.


 * 08:55, 18 Mar 2005, User:Deglr6328 joins in with a snide comment directed at Deeceevoice:
 * Thanks but I'll pass on taking advice on methods of scientific inquiry from civil rights era grandmas, no offence. :)


 * 09:05, 18 March 2005, and Wareware follows up with:
 * LOL delgre that's a good one....


 * 18:12, 18 Mar 2005, Deeceevoice:
 * "Ape." "Savage." "Jungle." "Big black momma." Blatantly racist comments. And the pathetic thing is you [haven't] even the good sense/common decency to be ashamed. Most animals who feel as you do at least have the good sense to say such things in private. ROTFLMBAO. What a sorry, sick, foolish, little excuse for a human being you are ...


 * 19:03, 18 Mar 2005, Wareware:
 * ... Here, have a banana, it'll make you feel better :)


 * 20:00, 18 Mar 2005, Wareware:
 * You're dumber than an ape really.


 * 07:37, 19 Mar 2005, Wareware:
 * Talk:Race_%28Archive_15%29, everyone go on a have a laugh at the ape (scroll to the one about egyptians).

Wareware later feigns an apology laced with insults, at the end of which he sarcastically throws in another simian reference for good measure:
 * 12:02, 20 Mar 2005, in [[Black supremacy], Wareware writes:
 * Sorry about mocking you with racial slurs, deecee. I think next time I'll have to come up with more creative and more PC ways to address your intelligence and conduct. I suppose a bag of shit or a cockroach nincompoop is better than apes or savages for the more sensitive.  I'm not really acquainted with yo mama jokes and the dozens to come up with original insults like you do all the time, so I just took the lazy way and called you an ape directly.  ...a single mention of ape is going to get me labelled a racist.  Just remember kids, it's okay to insult people if you're creative and don't jump into using racial slurs like I did, and make sure you don't ever call black people apes or else they'll go monkey on you.

WW then pursues DC to Talk:African American Vernacular English, but DC won't engage:


 * 02:51, 24 Mar 2005, Wareware:
 * I see that you're having fun ridiculing other folks again, pretty much illustrating what I wrote in the black supremacy discussion page. You're living proof no kidding.


 * 05:49, 24 Mar 2005, Deeceevoice:
 * Re: Wareware's post: I have absolutely no intention of engaging this racist mental cretin who uses words like "ape," "savage," "jungle," "monkey" when referring to black folks in a discussion on AAVE. Period.

Finally, in an exchange in talk: Black supremacy, Wareware and deeceevoice are engaged in a discussion on the applicability of the phrase "liberation theology" to the dogma of the Nation of Islam, wherein Wareware repeatedly misunderstands the connection. He erroneously repeats the charge that she is equating black supremacy with liberation theology. deeceevoice patiently and repeatedly attempts to explain; but Wareware becomes increasingly agitated.
 * 02:54, 24 March 2005
 * You're not answering the question.... Can you read?


 * 06:41, March 24
 * This is getting stupid. Can you even read?

Mindful of the pattern of Wareware's abuse, deeceevoice suspects his verbal attacks will escalate in short order. She advises him, "And change your tone." It is at this point that she decides to search for some resolution to her ongoing problems with user Wareware -- which leads us here.

(end of excerpt)

Sumitted. deeceevoice 09:05, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Evidence presented by pharlap
Note: Please see my statement at the talk page as well

While I agree that Warewares attempt to fight "fire with fire" was inappropriate,  the circumstances and climate surrounding the misbehavoir (Personal attacks, general racially offensive remarks against non-blacks, edit wars and the overall negative climate on talk pages imposed by deeceevoice) should not be ignored, especially since they most likely will trigger negative behavior from other users in the future as well.

Unfortunatly, the "Evidence of disputed behavior" provided by deeceevoice is faulty, the timeline is inaccurate, the provided diffs are often unrelated and the assertions are often untrue.

The complete collection of diffs below add credibility to Warewares statement. 

The complete timeline and collection of diffs indicate that:


 * deeceevoice started the exchange of blows
 * Wareware didn't "make a number of reverts without carefully reading the text and in some cases simply automatically repeatedly reverts self-edits by deeceevoice, including her correction of a typo" (notice that Ware only edited the article in question twice, while  deeceevoice edited the article 29 times, 18 of them reverts/deletions of of earlier contributions from other editors (user Warewares 2(!!) edits included)
 * deeceevoice often "barely skimmed" articles before she reverted edits and attacked the editors
 * the assertion that Wareware resurfaced at Talk: Cool (aesthetic) is untrue
 * deeceevoices diff #13 to prove how she "disengage" from alleged "attacks" is not related to a personal attack, but to article discussions which challenged her biased notions
 * Wareware tried to reason with deeceevoice, but she repeatedly attacked him
 * deeceevoice refused offered mediation
 * deeceevoice attacked Wareware directly as well as indirectly in conversations with other users
 * deeceevoice often responds with racial slurs and frequently claims racism when other editors question her contributions and/or ask her to source her contributions
 * deeceevoice thinks that she is the one who is entitled to lose patience
 * Wareware didn't "stalk" deeceevoice: deeceevoice placed requests on talk pages, asking other editors to "check out" her contributions to Black supremacy, but when Wareware did so and disagreed with her edits, she called him a racist and a "stalker"
 * the Npov tags from Wareware were accepted by everybody but deeceevoice
 * deeceevoice often refuses to explain or source her contributions and replies with attacks instead
 * deeceevoice starts edit wars and disputes over her POV edits almost everywhere she goes
 * several users questioned deeceevoices racial attacks and POV edits

In conclusion, the pot is calling the kettle black.

Evidence of disputed behavior (sorted by: 1. Article, 2. Date)

Race
It starts at Talk:Race, 26 Oct 2004, when deeceevoice joins the edit team of the featured article stating that the informations provided are "Ridiculously False Assumptions" and "European pseudo-scientice" eventhough she admits that she didn't take the time to read the entire article "I haven't read the entire article -- not nearly. In fact, I've barely skimmed it"

A lenghty discussion starts regarding whether ancient Egyptians were black,  Buddha a darkskin black of african origin and Pre Persian-incursion Indians nappy-headed black Africans.

14 Dec 2004, 09:59 Wareware objects



14 Dec 2004, 09:59 deeceevoice insists that her statements are correct because "Egyptian scholarship is riddled with hacks, liars, racists and the ill-informed"



14 Dec 2004, 11:36 Wareware states that egyptian studies have been clouded not only by classical Egyptologists, but also by Afrocentrists.



14 Dec 2004, 16:57 deeceevoice hurls personal insult at Wareware: Note that, in the black community, calling an adult man a Boy/Bwoi is considered a stinging insult



14 Dec 2004, 22:16 Wareware responds



Wareware explains the term "Must make your balls feel big" here:

Note that deeceevoice never explained HER racial slurs to Wareware

14 Dec 2004, 22:54 deeceevoice attacks Wareware

14 Dec 2004, 23:36 Wareware responds to deeceevoice's attack with a counter attack:



15 Dec 2004, 00:36 deeceevoice responds with personal attacks



'15 Dec 2004, 01:38' Wareware responds



15 Dec 2004, 02:39 deeceevoice responds with a personal insult



15 Dec 2004, 03:08 and 16 Dec 2004, 00:37 Wareware responds





After this verbal fight, both move on.

Between 16 Dec 2004 and 6 Feb 2005, Wareware edits ~28 articles without causing any disputs or arguments.

'''Between 16 Dec 2004 and 6 Feb 2005, deeceevoice edits ~ 32 articles, starts serveral edit wars and attacks other editors. Examples:

December 2004 Kwanzaa
24 Dec 2004, 11:02, and 30 Dec 2004, 15:56 and 12:17 deeceevoice attacks the edit team and claims racism after they restored informations she deleted from the article:

):





December 2004/January 2005 New anti-Semitism
1 Jan 2005, 01:34 deeceevoice starts edit war, attacks the edit team and after she gets a 24 hour block for violating the 3RR she blames "a handful of Zionist azzholes who can't stand to read a differing opinion"



3 Feb 2005, 23:19  deeceevoice starts to edit Black supremacy "This article was garbage",

 5 Feb 2005, 11:45, deeceevoice adds "Melanin Theory" to Black supremacy

5 Feb 2005, 11:54, deeceevoice adds Black supremacy reference to Melanin

February 2005 Superconductivity
deeceevoice starts edit war

5 Feb 2005, 14:57, In an attempt to support the key assertions of Melanin Theory deeceevoice added to Black supremacy, deeceevoice adds incorrect informations about the properties of Melanin toSuperconductivity and a link to black supremacy

6 Feb 2005, 01:47, RJFJR removes her edits

6 Feb 2005, 04:04, [User:Deeceevoice|deeceevoice]] accuses the Superconductivity edit team of racism and reverts her edits: ´

6 Feb 2005, 04:32, [User:Furrykef|Furrykef] removes her edits again and comments 04:50, 6 Feb 2005



6 Feb 2005, 11:15, deeceevoice moves on to Organic semiconductor adds incorrect imformation about the properties of Melanin and Melanin reference to Organic semiconductor

11 Mar 2005, 21:36, Qdr removes her edits. "Removed some desinformation (note: Melanin is not a mainstream research topic in this area)"

deeceevoice adds Melanin reference to Semiconductor

deeceevoice adds  Black supremacy reference to Afrocentrism 

Melanin
5 Feb 2005, 12:01''' deeceevoice asks the Melanin editors to check out Black supremacy for her recent Melanin additions. 

6 Feb 2005, 01:12, In response, Wareware posts a link which disputes the Melanin Theory:



6 Feb 2005, 03:38, deeceevoice insists on including the melanin Theory in Melanin



Wareware moves on and edits Yu the Great, Zhang Qian and  Li Ao

10 Feb 2005, 16:41 Mjklin| makes minor grammar edit

11 Feb 2005, 06:17, deeceevoice reverts Mjklin| edits

12 Feb 2005, 18:35, Babajobu edits Melanin



12 Feb 2005, 18:48, deeceevoice deletes all edits by Babajobu and restores her own

13 Feb 2005, 02:03, Babajobu responds



14 Feb 2005, 05:40, Wareware edits melanin "Pigmentation and social and race bias - clean up"

14 Feb 2005, 09:30, deeceevoice deletes all edits by Wareware  and restores her own

14 Feb 2005 10:46, Wareware restores his edits 

15 Feb 2005, 15:02, deeceevoice attacks Babajobu, calling him obtuse and ignorant, and his edits vandalism



After this personal attack, Babajobu refrains from contributing to the melanin and race bias section. 

8 Mar 2005, 14:55, deeceevoice restores her edits 

8 Mar 2005, 18:41, Wareware revertes deeceevoice edits "that doesnt belong here"

8 Mar 2005, 19:12, deeceevoice restores her edits 

9 Mar 2005, 03:32, Wareware revertes the edits 



9 Mar 2005, 06:24, deeceevoice restores her edits



 Mar 9 2005, 06:57, pstudier comments:



9 Mar 2005, 07:11,> Wareware responds



9 Mar 2005, 09:53, deeceevoice accuses Wareware of stalking her.



9 Mar 2005, 10:16, Wareware responds



9 Mar 2005, 11:31, deeceevoice responds with an attack against Wareware accusing him of being racist



9 Mar 2005 15:45, deeceevoice restores her edits

9 Mar 2005, 16:48, Wareware restores his edits

9 Mar 2005, 16:56, Wareware responds 

9 Mar 2005, 17:16, deeceevoice denies that she accused him of racism



9 Mar 2005, 17:24, deeceevoice restores her edits

10 Mar 2005, 01:40, Wareware edits "Melanin and human adaptation" (a different, unrelated section of the article)

10 Mar 2005, 11:20, deeceevoice reverts his edits "Another mindless revert. Reverted"

11 Mar 2005, 18:51, Wareware trys to reason with deeceevoice



10 Mar 2005 19:19, and 11 Mar 2005, 02:33 Wareware requests for mediation

 

10 Mar 2005, 18:52, Wareware asks for page protection

11 Mar 2005, 02:38, After Wareware notifies deeceevoice he submitted the melanin disput RfM  ,

11 Mar 2005, 20:23, deeceevoice responds with another attack and accuses him, again, of stalking:



18 Mar 2005, 08:20, deeceevoice advertises her Melanin Theory edits again



27 Mar 2005, 15:24, Tony Sidaway removes melanin page protection. 

29 Mar 2005, 11:15, deeceevoice reverts her edits

Mar 31, 02:06, RJFJR objects:



31 Mar 2005, 06:27, deeceevoice responds with a racial slur against RJFJR:



2005 Mar 31, 22:54, pstudier comments



1 Apr 2005, 01:33, deeceevoice denies her comment against RJFJR



2005 Apr 1, 02:34, pstudier responds:



1 Apr 2005, 05:02, deeceevoice denies her comment against RJFJR again and accuses Wareware (who by then already left the discussion) of being "the racist"



Afrocentrism
7 Feb 2005 deeceevoice starts editing Afrocentrism and puts the NPOVs tag on the article claiming that    but  then removes the whole "Radical Afrocentrism" section and the NPOV tag



8 Feb 2005, 01:42, User 128.97.1.207 restores the section

8 Feb 2005, 07:04, deeceevoice deletes the section again 

9 Feb 2005, 08:16, El C restores the section

9 Feb 2005, 15:39, Babajobu joins the edit team

01:30, Wareware joins the edit team and adds the NPOV tag



10 Feb 2005, 03:16, El_C agrees with the NPOV tag





El_C, Wareware, Paul Barlow and Babajobu POV edit the article

10 Feb 2005, 11:58, deeceevoice reverts the edits



 10 Feb 2005, 12:27, El_C asks deeceevoice to refrain from heated exclamations and explains the rationale behind the changes



 10 Feb 2005, 15:35, deeceevoice objects, indirectly attacking Wareware



10 Feb 2005, 17:37, Paul B questions deeceevoices assertion that Corinthian columns originated in Egypt

10 Feb 2005, 17:58, deeceevoice starts her response with an personal attack against Paul B

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=Talk:Afrocentrism&diff=next&oldid=10135256]

10 Feb 2005, 19:15, Babajobu asks deeceevoice to provide sources for her claims



10 Feb 2005, 21:34, deeceevoice responds to Babajobu with a racial slur



10 Feb 2005, 22:06, El_C asks deeceevoice the second time to refrain from personal attacks

and many others. I have already asked you to cease from these, and it is not fair that I would have to reiterate that a second time (!) It is tautological and mildly insulting. 

11 Feb 2005, 04:20, Ware restores several informations regarding Afrocentrism. 

11 Feb 2005, 05:46, deeceevoice "After skimming, some overall comments" objects and responds with another racial slur



11 Feb 2005, 06:04, Ware tries to reason with deeceevoice



11 Feb 2005, 11:17, deeceevoice responds with an insult against Ware



11 Feb 2005, 09:47, El_C responds to deeceevoice

and asks her to cease immediately from making comments which violate Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy



11 Feb 2005, 11:17, deeceevoice responds with another attack against El_C



11 Feb 2005, 11:42, Babajobu asks deeceevoice to stop the dinner-table ranting and mocking of her  collaborators on this article



11 Feb 2005, 11:48, Ware responds to deeceevoices insult



11 Feb 2005, 13:07, El_C responds to deeceevoices attack against him 

 13 Feb 2005, 03:03, Ware racist, white supremacist assumptions regarding the contributions of nonwhite peoples to world history. What's this, a strawman attack that makes all Western research "white supremacist"? You gotta be kidding me. Renaissance, the Enlightenment, nationalism and related ideas and philosophies are western ideas, so what's so "white supremacist" about it. I don't think any Chinese person that I've talked to regard history as white supremacist or Eurocentric at best. Saying so is rather vitriolic. 

El_C, Wareware, Paul Barlow, Babajobu and -- Uncle Ed keep on discussing and editing the article.

20 Feb 2005, 11:58, deeceevoice deletes/reverts the new edits



 20 Feb 2005, 13:25, Paul B comments



 20 Feb 2005, 18:15, deeceevoice responds with racial slurs 

20 Feb 2005, 19:52, Ware tries to reason



 23 Feb 2005, 12:41, Paul B criticizes deeceevoice edits about how Egyptians depicted themselves



 23 Feb 2005, 13:24, deeceevoice responds with a insult and racial slur



23 Feb 2005, 15:52, -- Uncle Ed asks to avoid making personal remarks about other contributors and offers mediation



23 Feb 2005, 20:16, [User:Deeceevoice|deeceevoice]] refuses



24 Feb 2005, 03:54, El_C comments



'''Between 24 Feb and 26 Feb, Ware edits Afrocentrism twice (2 times), Between 24 Feb and 26 Feb, deeceevoice edits Afrocentrism 29 times, 18 of them are reverts/deletions of earlier contributions from other editors .'''

Nevertheless deeceevoice interdicts Ware from editing the article, and threatens to report him for violating the 3-reverts rule.

26 Feb 2005, 10:34, deeceevoice:



and, after El_C 02:30, 27 Feb 2005, complains that deeceevoice "changes were split through such a great number of successive edits (tens), it makes following the changes a rather prohibitive task", [User:Deeceevoice|deeceevoice]]  indirectly attacks Ware and blames his  "mindless and repeated reverts"  for her edits.

27 Feb 2005, 09:18, deeceevoice:



Cool (aesthetic)
deeceevoice's assertion that Ware resurfaces at Talk: Cool (aesthetic) is not true.

February/March 2005

deeceevoice starts an edit war about the definition of Cool (aesthetic) attacks other editors after they challenge her edits and ask her to list her sources

8 Mar 2005, 00:26,

deeceevoice :



8 Mar 2005, 14:42, After an anonymous user challenges deeceevoice edits she  accuses him of being a racist who anonymously vandalized her user page.



 8 Mar 2005, 17:07,

Lockeownzj00 joins the discussion, and also challenges deeceevoiceedits, now deeceevoice accuses Lockeownzj00  to be the anonymous person and personal attacks him.



9 Mar 2005, 01:31 and 03:35,

Lockeownzj00 asks deeceevoice  to source her edits,  and challenges her hostile tone and her POV edits  ,

deeceevoice refuses to provide her sources and responds with a personal attacks instead:

9 Mar 2005, 06:54 deeceevoice :



10 Mar 2005, 03:51,

deeceevoice :



9 Mar 2005, 03:57,

Ware leaves a note on Lockeownzj00 talk page 

12 Mar 2005, 03:38, Lockeownzj00  keeps asking for sources

12 Mar 2005, 23:34, deeceevoice refuse and continues her personal attacks against Lockeownzj00



13 Mar 2005, 04:45, Deglr6328 joins the discussion, and files an RfC  13 Mar 2005, 05:31,



African American Vernacular English
27 Oct 2004, 21:50, Nohat remarks that the assertion that differences in pronunciation are a carryover from West African languages is disputed

1 Nov 2004 07:05, / 8 Nov 2004 23:36, deeceevoice responds with a racial slur and accuses Nohat of racism

 

9 Nov 2004, 20:08, /10 Nov 2004, 05:32, Nohat clarifies that he wants to achieve NPOV and that his edits are not  motivated by racism  

10 Nov 2004, 01:33 and 11:30, deeceevoice responds  

11 Nov 2004, 19:56, Nohat withdraws from the discussion 

12 Nov 2004, 00:41, deeceevoice responds 

18 Mar 2005, 19:13, deeceevoice states that 

18 Mar 2005, 22:14, Quill challenges deeceevoices  assertion 

19 Mar 2005, 07:16, deeceevoice responds 

19 Mar 2005, 07:27, Marnen Laibow-Koser disagrees as well

19 Mar 2005, 10:55, deeceevoice responds with a racial slur 

 20 Mar 2005, 06:20,Marnen Laibow-Koser asks deeceevoice  to back up her assertion

 20 Mar 2005, 10:20, deeceevoice refuses and responds with a racial slur instead



20 Mar 2005, 16:03, Marnen Laibow-Koser again asks deeceevoice to back up her claims



21 Mar 2005, 03:16, deeceevoice still refuses and responds with a personal attack



21 Mar 2005, 21:16, Quill comments



21 Mar 2005, 21:34,  deeceevoice responds



22 Mar 2005, 21:41, Quill



22 Mar 2005, 22:09,  Marnen Laibow-Koser asks deeceevoice asgain to cite her sources 

22 Mar 2005, 22:53, deeceevoice responds with an attack against Quill



23 Mar 2005, 03:41, Marnen Laibow-Koser comments 

23 Mar 2005, 08:31, Quill comments 

23 Mar 2005, 19:37, deeceevoice attacks Quill



23 Mar 2005, 22:07, Quill responds



23 Mar 2005, 23:36, deeceevoice responds with another insult



24 Mar 2005, 02:51, Ware, in defense of Quill, calls deeceevoice on her double standard



24 Mar 2005, 05:49, deeceevoice responds



24 Mar 2005, 06:12, Ware