Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ (2nd)



 * Supporting evidence: TheYellowMoose fits the description of our serial sock-puppeteer (uses "This page intentionally left blank" for his user page in plain reference to mine) but so far only two edits and they are not conclusive, could be another sleeper? ...Dave1185 (talk) 01:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * -- At this time it is unlikely that there is a connection to the sockmaster. -- Avi (talk) 03:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help in checking, don't mind me being cautious b'cos I've been watching the new users' creation log all day for something that matches the sneaky lil' bastard. Sorta like Grawp hunting, haha! ...Dave1185 (talk) 03:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ

 * <- Sockmaster
 * Code letter: A, C, G
 * Code letter: A, C, G
 * Code letter: A, C, G
 * Code letter: A, C, G
 * Code letter: A, C, G
 * Code letter: A, C, G
 * Code letter: A, C, G
 * Code letter: A, C, G


 * Supporting evidence: Sockfarm being used to harass users involved with the block of ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ. This is a patently obvious sock farm.  The bottom 3 on the list were blocked by me after vandalising user pages.  The top three were pre-emptively blocked by me after culling through the user creation logs.  This is likely a larger sock farm, and we need to ferret out any sleepers and IP addresses and block those as well.  Thanks for your prompt attention.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  04:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Suspected_sock_puppets/ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ
 * Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents
 * Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 218.188.90.194

The user enjoys using "hohoho" and barely types capital letters. He obsesses with and seems to use open proxies.--Caspian blue (talk) 04:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - the following as being the one editor:




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 05:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * another one likely to be the same user. See if that one is part of a sockfarm like todays batch.  BTW, as an aside, Alison rules... --Jayron32. talk . contribs  05:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * A different IP (surprise!) but same useragent, so that's a strong :


 * --> Confirmed sock: Exhibit similar behaviour as per - clearly as part of a orchestrated series of malicious attacks designed  to harass & diminish Dave1185's standing here & in the web space. No known constructive edit seen to date, except for a specific mention of a YouTube link (See the crafted user's profile there) that was created on 2 Oct 2008, shortly after a series of warnings & ANI cases were brought up against the primary sockpuppet. Pse enforce indef block ASAP to pre-empt further abuse as per  -- Aldwinteo (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * --> Confirmed sock: Exhibit similar behaviour as per - clearly as part of a orchestrated series of malicious attacks designed  to harass & diminish Dave1185's standing here & in the web space. No known constructive edit seen to date, except for a specific mention of a YouTube link (See the crafted user's profile there) that was created on 2 Oct 2008, shortly after a series of warnings & ANI cases were brought up against the primary sockpuppet. Pse enforce indef block ASAP to pre-empt further abuse as per  -- Aldwinteo (talk) 16:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * and for a while, hardblock - possible proxy -  A l is o n  ❤ 05:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * probably is as well judging by the IP's sole edit, which was also to User talk:Vietnameseischinesenotcantoneseisvietnamese. --Kralizec! (talk) 12:30, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * - A l is o n  ❤ 17:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * is another suspect, same vandal behavior on the page of User:Baseball Bugs. ...Dave1185 (talk) 18:45, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * is another who vandalised my page identical to all the others. Submitting to check for sock farm and IPs/Proxy check.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  21:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅} - both of those. They're one-off accounts on their own IPs - A l is o n  ❤ 02:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Could you also check this impersonating accounts to leave inappropriate message to me? It is odd that if the two were ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ, he really quickly figured out my previous screen name and it is not consistent to his fondness of using "HuangDi". I think the account could be copycats.--Caspian blue (talk) 02:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Both of the above are ✅, needless to say, as well as the three or four others since then.


 * - due to ongoing socking and harassment, the following IP ranges have been blocked for two weeks. There should be minimal collateral damage - I checked first:


 * - A l is o n  ❤ 07:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * - A l is o n  ❤ 07:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * - A l is o n  ❤ 07:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Request, could you confirm on whether ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ is a reincarnation of The users share the same obsession of empire or emperor. The habits of vadalism are identical to each other, and they use same ISP as well as live in the same location. (Queens, NY) Requests for checkuser/Case/RestoreTheEmpireSociety. RestoreTheEmpireSociety was blocked for his racist attacks/vandalism in June after a ANI report on him, and ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ appeared here around July. I believe that the page should be merged into one if they're the same troll.--Caspian blue (talk) 07:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd say it's likely on behaviour, but I've no way of telling per checkuser as the old case data is -  A l is o n  ❤ 07:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''