Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/...And Beyond!

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

...And Beyond!



 * "I do have a username, as I've mentioned perhaps three times before, but have apparently been ignored. I have also explained why I can't edit from it"
 * "I do have a username, as I've mentioned perhaps three times before, but have apparently been ignored. I have also explained why I can't edit from it"
 * "I do have a username, as I've mentioned perhaps three times before, but have apparently been ignored. I have also explained why I can't edit from it"
 * "I do have a username, as I've mentioned perhaps three times before, but have apparently been ignored. I have also explained why I can't edit from it"
 * "I do have a username, as I've mentioned perhaps three times before, but have apparently been ignored. I have also explained why I can't edit from it"
 * "I do have a username, as I've mentioned perhaps three times before, but have apparently been ignored. I have also explained why I can't edit from it"
 * "I do have a username, as I've mentioned perhaps three times before, but have apparently been ignored. I have also explained why I can't edit from it"
 * "I do have a username, as I've mentioned perhaps three times before, but have apparently been ignored. I have also explained why I can't edit from it"



This seems to be yet another manifestation of an editor who has been discussed and reported frequently: see


 * Requests for comment/Antidote
 * Requests for checkuser/Case/Antidote

He admits to being the first two anon IPs: 

--Runcorn 19:41, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

✅ Also, these two accounts:

--Mackensen (talk) 22:10, 15 September 2006 (UTC) ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''