Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/24.172.64.66

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

24.172.64.66



 * G:

The IP's reverting continued through to December 17 - (11/27), (12/6) , (12/11) , (12/12) , (12/16) , , , and (12/17). This behavior was repeated with Powers and abilities of Superman starting on December 7. This time the version reverted to was about 4 1/2 months old. Again, the reversions continued through December 17 - (12/11), (12/12) , (12/16) , , , (12/17). This did generate comments and warning on the IP's talk page as well as a 2 day block from an uninvolved Admin (Jc37). The IP's comments on the situation also appeared on other user talk pages as they become involved - (my talk page), , (Sesshomaru's) , and (Jc37's) (after the block ended). - J Greb (talk) 16:22, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Supporting evidence:
 * On November 22, the IP focused on reverting Wonder Woman to a version from almost 5 months previously . (Also note that the June 28 edit was reverted as vandalism .)
 * JJoseph145's first edit appeared 10 minutes after the IP's "good bye", and was to revert Wonder Woman to the IP's preferred content . The second edit was to do the same with Powers and abilities of Superman . After a spate of other, unrelated edits on December 20, there has been nothing else from this editor.
 * YoBaby'smama's first two, and only edits to date mirrored this and.
 * As a side note, another editor, David A, has tagged the three accounts as possible socks of JJonz. I am unsure of this, but do believe the 3 are likely all coming from the IP.

✅ Currently available technical and behavioral evidence indicates that the following accounts are related:



-- Avi (talk) 07:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * user blocked too, just to prove them the point. -- lucasbfr  ho ho ho 13:11, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''