Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Afinogenoff

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Afinogenoff

 * (see range contributions)
 * F Evading blocks, bans and remedies issued by community
 * Supporting evidence: Please, check Afinogenoff and sockpuppet Innv, and IP Range 83.149.52.0/22. Innv = Afinogenoff, is 100% correct information, see evidence: Afinogenoff is strong and serious sockpuppeter. Afinogenoff@ruwiki has more 28 sockpuppets. Afinogenoff inclined to create a "female" account.
 * F Evading blocks, bans and remedies issued by community
 * Supporting evidence: Please, check Afinogenoff and sockpuppet Innv, and IP Range 83.149.52.0/22. Innv = Afinogenoff, is 100% correct information, see evidence: Afinogenoff is strong and serious sockpuppeter. Afinogenoff@ruwiki has more 28 sockpuppets. Afinogenoff inclined to create a "female" account.


 * 83.149.52.0/22 - is official IP Range of Afinogenoff, sockpuppeter using this range on spam-listed resource (wiki.traditio.ru), and on Ru.wiki (provocations / vandalism / trolling)
 * Puppeteer use this ip range for trolling and provocations on RuWiki. See trolling, trolling, delete text, trollind on Arbcom vote page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, request for arbitration: trolling, UPOV-pushing: 1, 2.


 * This is sockpuppet of serious vandal Afinogenoff, see Pauk's quote in LJ: [russian:А разве Таллирдиева фотки публиковала? И тоже УЖЕ не в Википедии.][english:How Tallirdieva photos published? And also not ALREADY in Wikipedia.][comment:Tallidieva is Afinogenoff's indefblocked virtual] - they wrote this on livejournal community ru_wikipedia.
 * Answer to this post: 1) AndyVolykhov:1) публиковала; 2) нет, в Википедии, под другим логином.][english:1) published; 2) No, in Wikipedia, under another username.]. 2) [AndyVolykhov:Фотка уже удалена, видимо. А ник сейчас, как писал админ меты на IRC-канале - Innv.][english: Photo has already been removed, apparently. A nick now, as the Meta-sysop wrote to IRC-channel - Innv.][comment:Innv=Tallirdieva=Afinogenoff].


 * There are similarities of style Innv and sockpuppets Afinogenoff:


 * Non-standart signature, with links to discussions, and contribution and anywhere. Please, compare: signature of T-tok, indefblocked virtual of Afinogenoff: t-tok, and Innv: --~ Innv s: and Afinogenoff (on listed in the spam list resource, wiki.traditio.ru): —  Afin oge noff   §, and Dream (renamed Afinogenoff on spam listed resource):  Dream .
 * Abundant use of smile all Afinogenoff's sockpuppets: see user talk T-tok and user talk Innv on Meta.
 * See almost two entirely back-phrase: in user talk Innv on Meta-wiki: Всегда пожалуйста! Если что обращайтесь :) and phrase on spam listed resource: Всегда пожалуйста, если что — обращайся.


 * Innv similar to AstroNomer-ru its activities - he also was productive with the party elected writing articles, but has been blocked for similar reasons - sockpuppetry.


 * Also, sockpuppet T-tok participants was very positive, even had received permission "patroller", but it was blocked for sockpuppetry - Afinogenoff was puppeteers.

Note: approximately July 11, 2008 Afinogenoff (as Dream on spam-listed resource) wiki-break and Innv also a thing of the Wiki-break. The appearance of activity Afinogenoff on spam-listed resource coincided coincides with an activity Innv on Wikimedia wikis.

Thanks, Antiafi (talk) 11:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Merged from Requests for checkuser/Case/Puppets of Afinogenoff. – Luna Santin  (talk) 22:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * - this is all rather pointless. Completing as I know there are interwiki issues here and checkusers on other projects may be working on this, too.


 * is not on that IP range
 * There are no editors on the above IP range other than two anon edits
 * There are no editors on the above IP range other than two anon edits


 * - A l is o n  ❤ 11:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Afinogenoff

 * I want to be checked up, as some count that I sockpuppet.
 * I want to be checked up, as some count that I sockpuppet.


 * Code letter: Replace this text with the code letter from table at the top of Requests for checkuser that matches your request.

Replace this text with your explanation of your request for checkuser and examples of policy violations. --Afinogenoff 03:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The table at the top of WP:RFCU says: Checkuser on yourself to "prove your innocence" - Such requests are not accepted. Please do not ask. I'm delisting this request, you need to find a code letter that applies. --Michael Billington (talk) 03:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Uh... last line says you can. Kwsn (Ni!) 03:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, but enwiki's policy is that we reject all such requests, as the results are meaningless; Checkuser cannot prove innocence, it can only provide strong indications of guilt. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 18:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Given the motivating factor behind this request (a failed BRFA), it's moot anyway. Shalom Hello 21:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC) ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''
 * It has been over 3 days since this was moved into the non-compliant requests, so I will now close/archive this request. Fun  Pika  16:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)