Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AlborzTaha

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

AlborzTaha





 * Code letter: G

Per Tim's comment below. Both users (AlborzTaha, Tim Abbot) have engaged in repeated slow edit warring over the exact same articles, have the exact same POV, and revert to one another's version. Sockpuppetry seems fairly obvious in this case based on the contributions of these editors. Based on below and the fact that this user is still sockpuppeting and refusing to engage in discussion at all leads me to believe that he should probably be blocked indef. Khoikhoi 04:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 10:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * both accounts blocked and tagged; master's block extended to indefinite, per this rationale. Anthøny  07:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

AlborzTaha





 * Code letter: G

On Maryam Rajavi:
 * Supporting evidence:
 * - Please refrain from adding biased and false material favourable to the current Iranian theocracy.
 * - Undo language
 * - Blank summary
 * - Blank summary


 * On PMOI:
 * - Blank summary
 * - Blank summary
 * - Communication in edit summary rather than talk pages.
 * - Blank summary
 * - Undo language

On Massoud Rajavi:
 * - Blank summary
 * - Undo language
 * - Vandalism accusation
 * - Undo language
 * - Undo language

Users have engaged in a slow-burn edit war for over a year. All users are WP:SPAs whose only edits are to PMOI, Massoud Rajavi, Maryam Rajavi, and related articles. Users engage in communication rarely or not at all, despite being repeated invited to engage in discussion. Edits are defined by attempts to paint this organization and its leaders in a more positive light. Edit summaries are either blank, standard "Undo" language, or accusations of vandalism. //  Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 15:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ that AlborzTaha and Tib72 are the same, but Tom davy is ❌. Thatcher 00:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Tib72 blocked indef, AlborzTaha for one week. – Luna Santin  (talk) 09:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Also adding:

Making same edits as above, possible related to 193.219.246.199, which was blocked for sockpuppetry last year. //  Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 14:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''