Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amirkayani

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Amirkayani





 * Code letter: E, F

In the following Supporting evidence,... "g" diffs refer to the article, and "k" diffs refer to (all diffs represent tendentious reinsertions of the same family-member directory over and over again) -- 12 hour 3RRV block from 19:38, 24 April to 07:38, 25 April -- -- 1 week EW block, beginning 19:47, 25 April --
 * Edits of Amirkayani, hereafter referred to as "older" A.kayani:
 * g 07:32, 22 April * g 08:08, 22 April * g 19:35, 23 April
 * g 16:01, 24 April * g 14:08, 24 April * k 14:13, 24 April
 * g 10:01, 24 April * k 06:07, 25 April * g 06:59, 24 April
 * g 16:21, 25 April 2008 * k 16:22, 25 April 2008

(all diffs -- the editors entire edit history -- are all simply reverts to the version of the older A.kayani) * g 07:31, 26 April * k 07:31, 26 April * g 07:29, 26 April
 * Edits of Adilkayani, hereafter referred to as "newer" A.kayani:
 * g 06:08, 25 April * k 06:07, 25 April

The first list of diffs demonstrate an edit pattern in which the older A.kayani (account created 20. April) is quite content to edit war on his own. The second list of diffs, of the younger A.kayani (account created 25. April during older A.kayani block),
 * represent the younger A.kayanis entire edit history,
 * take place only while the older A.kayani was/is blocked
 * that are all simply reverts that reinstate the revision of the older A.kayani.

Although (IMO) both A.kayanis are patently disruptive, and hence would qualify for a block-on-sight per RFCU instructions, as Wafulz has noted on AN/I, there is some question of whether these two accounts can be treated as identical. Hence this RFCU. Please dismiss with rationale if a low-level checkuser is found to be unnecessary because the synonymity is obvious. Thanks. -- Fullstop (talk) 19:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - the following:




 * - A l is o n  ❤ 23:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''