Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amoruso

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Amoruso





 * Code letter: E


 * Neve Yaakov: first 3RR by User:Amoruso:, , , then User:Robertert  appear, reverting to User:Amoruso version:
 * Pisgat Ze'ev: first 3RR by User:Amoruso:, , , then User:Robertert  appear, reverting to User:Amoruso version:
 * Gilo: first 3RR by User:Amoruso:, , , then User:Robertert  appear, reverting to User:Amoruso version:
 * Ramot: first 3RR by User:Amoruso:, , , then  User:Robertert  appear, reverting to User:Amoruso version:

Notice that User:Amoruso and User:Robertert edits "dove-tail" quite nicely; they do not edit at the same time. After User:Amoruso has "used up" his 3 reverts on four different articles about Israeli settlements/neighbourhoods of Jerusalem,  User:Robertert  conveniently appear on the same articles, reverting to User:Amoruso  version. Regards, Huldra (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ that is also  and.
 * also . Thatcher 12:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Thatcher! I have reported it here, Regards, Huldra (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The admins there have said that someone here will follow up on this case. Please note that User:Robertert continues to edit-war at two of the pages in question, even though a checkuser has confirmed that he has used sockpuppets to tag-team edit the pages above. Considering the disruption is ongoing, can someone intervene here? Thanks.  T i a m u t talk 09:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

That is not true. No checkuser confirmed that I have used sockpuppets to tag-team edit any pages, or violate any Wikipedia protocol. Thanks for not even notifying me of this. Whatever administrator taking care of this should please email me. --Robertert (talk) 15:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Let me clarify my comment further. The checkuser "confirmed" that Robertert uses two other accounts listed above, and further indicated it was "likely" that User:Amoruso was also commandered by the same user. The tag-team editing documented by User:Huldra was effected by Robertert and Amoruso's accounts. The evidence therefore indicates that the charge of sockpuppetry is appropriate. However, as I have little technical knowledge regarding how checkuser works and what alternate explanations there may be for such an outcome, I will defer to admins on this.  T i a m u t talk 10:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Dealt with. Blocked all the socks indef and Amoruso, the main account, for two months. Moreschi (talk) (debate) 16:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I was wondering how long the disruption was going to be allowed to go on before someone stepped up. You are an editor both brave and industrious Moreschi. Thanks.  T i a m u t talk 17:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * A big thank you both to Moreschi and Thatcher for their work. (As for Robertert´claims: well, I was involved when User:Amoruso was blocked the first time for 3RR. He also then had a rather special presentation of the editing history, a presentation which nobody else agreed with.) Regards, Huldra (talk) 03:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''