Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AnonymousGoodFaith

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

AnonymousGoodFaith



 * Code letter: B

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''
 * Supporting evidence: AnonymousGoodFaith's first edit was a lengthy statement to an RFAR in which he indicated that he had interacted with WMC previously. This sort of behavior is in violation of the Arbcom ruling Requests_for_arbitration/Privatemusings which prohibits alternate accounts for the purposes of engaging in internal wiki debate. Requesting checkuser to identify and temporarily block the main account for violation of arbcom ruling and WP:SOCK.  MBisanz  talk 21:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * . Nothing of interest in the CU evidence.  RBI.  Sam Korn (smoddy)
 * Account blocked indef. Tiptoety  talk 00:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'm pretty sure I know who this is. I'm not convinced the name should be revealed as long as there is no serious attempt to disrupt the RFAR, and I think the better course of action when sock puppets come to accuse people is to ignore them unless they are willing to use their own name.  The individual is invited to contact me if he would like to discuss the matter. Thatcher 16:14, 11 July 2008 (UTC)