Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Anotherblogger

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Anotherblogger


was banned earlier today for threatening to DDOS attack wikipedia if he wasn't allowed to make a particular edit to Perverted-Justice.com. Throughout the day, he had been making this edit repeatedly, despite being reverted by a number of users, since consensus was against this edit. Shortly after he was banned, continued to make the edits, leading me to suspect that  is a sockpuppet of a banned user, and should also be banned. Fieari 22:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Originally closed with no action (stale). Thatcher131

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.''

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

and
After Anotherblogger was indef banned, and the article he liked to mess with was Semi-Protected, ScottMiller showed up trying to push a website heavily related to the website Anotherblogger was working on. ScottMiller's confrontational, antagonistic tone on the talk page is reminiscent of Anotherblogger. Could they be one in the same? Fieari 00:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * While the CheckUser evidence isn't conclusive, it's somewhat persuasive. They both edit from the same /24 address range in the same ISP's dynamically-assigned IP range.  Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 06:44, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.''