Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Antidote

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Mehmeda



 * (confirmed as Antidote sock in Requests for checkuser/Case/Antidote)
 * others in Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Antidote
 * Code letter: F
 * Code letter: F

was blocked by who believes Mehmeda's contributions indicate that Mehmeda is a sock of indefblocked vandal. I'm reviewing Mehmeda's unblock request and believe a checkuser might validate Runcorn's block; otherwise community block review will have to take place at WP:AN. More case history can be found at Mehmeda's talk. Sandstein 22:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * merged from Requests for checkuser/Case/Mehmeda. -- lucasbfr talk 23:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Both accounts last edited in 2006 and are too old to be checked. Do you know any confirmed sockpupet account that has edited in the last month? -- lucasbfr talk 23:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Try . IPs may be in the ranges 141.211.*.* or 141.213.*.* --Runcorn 23:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Two things to make clear that haven't been made clear before. Lucasbfr is asking for a confirmed sockpuppet of Antidote that has edited within the last month, not a suspected sockpuppet. You'd need to confirm that is a sockpuppet of Antidote before you can confirm I am one through somebody else. Secondly, this isn't a  community ban, so if this does move to WP:AN, you couldn't call it that. Only Runcorn blocked this username. Hi, this is User:Mehmeda. I'm allowed to comment on these proceedings given most people are blocked AFTER this type of evidence and not before. See USER TALK:Mehmeda for details.


 * Also this isn't a case letter F because User:Antidote wasn't community banned. Actually maybe he was, but you would need to provide a diff of the community ban. The account was only blocked by User:Runcorn not by a community consensus of any sort. Mehmeda2 00:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * For the record, the last RFCU says that Antidote's IP range is bellsouth, so why are people checking the Midwestern 141. ranges? There was already a IP range block enforced by User:Runcorn that blocked a huge amount of people from editing wikipedia (the 141. range covers up to 5 universities) and for no other reason than "sockpuppet." Maybe you should get more proof before range blocking legitimate users again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.94.128.106 (talk • contribs)

--Mackensen (talk) 20:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Antidote




User has started doing exactly the same things complained about in a previous RFC here Requests for comment/Antidote, removing people from Jewish lists, removing Jewish categories from peoples articles or information that says they were Jewish, edit warring on population numbers, and using hostile edit summaries. Arniep 13:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

All these IP's are Bell South. The use of Bell South IPs is also noted in the above-referenced RFC. Thatcher131 14:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

. Essjay  (  Talk  •  Connect  )  08:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Can you elaborate somewhat? Have any of these exact ips used by one or both of these accounts, if so, how many? Arniep 22:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

"Responses will be cursory in nature in order to comply with Wikipedia privacy policy; supporting data is not provided." Essjay  (  Talk  •  Connect  )  08:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.''