Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Arigato1

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Tesko111111



 * Code letter:F


 * Supporting evidence: He edits the same articles as banned editor user:Comanche cph (and socks) uses the same edit summaries and the same agressive editing pattern.--Berig (talk) 12:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * UPDATE: He did not dispute his being Comanche cph, but stuck to old habits by blanking the page. I have permanently blocked him for ban evasion.--Berig (talk) 13:38, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * He has now declared that he will continue his block evasions.--Berig (talk) 14:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merged into Requests for checkuser/Case/Arigato1. —Wknight94 (talk) 17:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! His block has been reviewed by Jpgordon, but he keeps removing the review,, .--Berig (talk) 17:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ Technical and behavioral evidence confirms the following:
 * regarding User:Arigato1 and User:Comanche cph.
 * -- Avi (talk) 23:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * regarding User:Arigato1 and User:Comanche cph.
 * -- Avi (talk) 23:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * -- Avi (talk) 23:27, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged. OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Here's another sock.--Berig (talk) 19:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Quacks very loud. Blocked & tagged. P.S. Someone beat me to it and already blocked this account while I'm typing this message OhanaUnitedTalk page 21:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Arigato 2

 * Since it is about something as serious as block evasion. Could someone please check whether Huskarl is the same user. As early as his 7th and 8th edits ever, he not only reinserts original reseach by the blocked user:Arigato1 (aka user:Comanche cph), he also makes the same language error ("removing of" instead of "removal of").--Holger the Dane 15:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * David Gerard checked, confirmed that Huskarl is another sock, I blocked, David in addition found and blocked:
 * Thanks for the help! This is probably archivable at this point unless there's another outbreak... ++Lar: t/c 18:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I subsequently unblocked Hestemand and Andrudis, their edits do not fit the pattern of Arigato1, pending further investigation. ++Lar: t/c 00:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comanche's / Arigato1's IP (194.255.124.250) is still open and he is using it. Valentinian T / C 17:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * See also Requests for checkuser/Case/Holger the Dane where Comanche/Arigato1 is asking for some (in my view) fishing around about Holger the Dane... ++Lar: t/c 21:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please provide a code letter.  Real96  21:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Same as Arigato 1... C and F apply. Case is closable though, at least for now. The correlations are present as noted above, and the user has been blocked indefinitely. ++Lar: t/c 03:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help! This is probably archivable at this point unless there's another outbreak... ++Lar: t/c 18:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I subsequently unblocked Hestemand and Andrudis, their edits do not fit the pattern of Arigato1, pending further investigation. ++Lar: t/c 00:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comanche's / Arigato1's IP (194.255.124.250) is still open and he is using it. Valentinian T / C 17:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * See also Requests for checkuser/Case/Holger the Dane where Comanche/Arigato1 is asking for some (in my view) fishing around about Holger the Dane... ++Lar: t/c 21:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please provide a code letter.  Real96  21:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Same as Arigato 1... C and F apply. Case is closable though, at least for now. The correlations are present as noted above, and the user has been blocked indefinitely. ++Lar: t/c 03:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Please provide a code letter.  Real96  21:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Same as Arigato 1... C and F apply. Case is closable though, at least for now. The correlations are present as noted above, and the user has been blocked indefinitely. ++Lar: t/c 03:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Please archive this now. Dmcdevit·t 04:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Arigato1



 * Code letter: C, F
 * Code letter: C, F
 * Code letter: C, F
 * Code letter: C, F
 * Code letter: C, F
 * Code letter: C, F
 * Code letter: C, F
 * Code letter: C, F

has been a very troublesome user with a slanted view of Danish and Scandinavian history. I am also tired of being on the receiving end of his abuse., (accusing me of being a sockmaster, Jew and gay, all in one sentence). Such actions have earned him numerous blocks, and I've been the one reporting him the most times. knows more about these accounts, he has often been the admin trying to stop this nonsense. Based on the editing style, the slanted view of history, and the topics interesting Arigato1, I'm also convinced that Arigato1 is the same person as, which was equally troublesome. Among their common interests are Vikings and in particular Rollo / Rolf / Hrolf Ganger.,. I can dig up more similarities if necessary. Comanche cph has been blocked numerous times, and Arigato1 is currently blocked. However, I believe he has previouly used the account to evade a block and I believe the same is the case now with both  and. 194.255.124.250 behaves in such a way that I can only consider it to be identical to both Comanche cph and Arigato1, and it replies with the form "I" on Comanche cph's talk page. This IP also has a very bad habit of impersonating me,, vandalising my user page and harrassing me and insulting both me and other users (I shall spare you the translation,  knows it). Arigato also has this habit.[, ]A further indication that and  is the same user is e.g. ,  and other edits to the same article's talk page.

The IP account knows the blocking policy very well, and attempts to hide behind a proxy. This IP has also been impersonating me on the Danish Wikipedia, and it has been indef blocked there for the same reason and because it smeared me there as well. The Danish admin da:Bruger:Kaare can confirm this. The edits of da:User:Comanche correspond to those of Comanche cph here, so it is obviously the same person. On the same day as two of Arigato1's accounts were blocked last time, an account impersonating me was blocked on the Danish Wikipedia (the account in question was da:Bruger:Valentinian. I use the name da:Bruger:Valentin on the Danish Wikipedia, but Valentinian in all other contexts). Given the edit history of Rolf, I consider it clear that the IP not only matches Comanche cph but also Arigato1. Arigato1 and Comanche cph are, to my knowledge the only person(s) on Wikipedia that truly hate(s) me so I don't consider it a coincidence that imposter accounts suddenly appear after Arigato1's recent blocks. I consider this situation serious since e.g. - although stopped before it managed to do damage - contained a complete ripoff of my own userpage   compare with my own userpage. I am not at all happy with this attempt to trash my reputation on both this and the Danish Wikipedia, since I've contributed a very great number of hours on this project. My apologies that this became a long post, but this situation has been going on for a very long time. Valentinian T / C 19:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Update, this request turns up in but I'm not sure why. If anybody can fix this, I'd be grateful. Valentinian T / C 20:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not a bug, it's a feature :). Done. -- lucasbfr talk 20:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Note. A checkuser investigation performed by one of the en:wp Checkusers has already confirmed that Arigato1 and Klovn are almost certainly the same user. ("Hell yes" was the exact terminology used :) ... hey, it was an informal request. ) Hope that helps. ++Lar: t/c 22:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

that and  are the same user. Mackensen (talk) 15:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What of the rest of the IPs and users listed? In my considered judgement as an admin, based on edit patterns, I consider it extremely likely. But before I indef block the lot of them for disruption, which I almost certainly will, the next time there is disruption from any of them, it would be good to know that I'm not assuming something that is not true. I am not sure of the protocol here but I'd ask that this be moved back to incomplete requests. Tying them all back to comanche cph and his almost certain original IP would be the most help. I don't care so much about me... another user heaping incidental abuse on me is no big deal. But these users (this user) is/are harassing Valentinian, a very good and productive user who is a bit disheartened by all the effort expended on cleaning up messes. ++Lar: t/c 17:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

that and  are as well. Furthermore, I agree with those who relate these accounts back to Comanche Cph. Mackensen (talk) 18:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC) ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''
 * Since it is about something as serious as block evasion. Could someone please check whether Huskarl is the same user. As early as his 7th and 8th edits ever, he not only reinserts original reseach by the blocked user:Arigato1 (aka user:Comanche cph), he also makes the same language error ("removing of" instead of "removal of").--Holger the Dane 15:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)