Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Asgardian

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Asgardian
Due to potential new violation of restriction.




 * B:
 * This is the first anon edit,, this is the User:Asgardian edit, and this is the difference between the two..
 * This is the first anon edit,, this is the User:Asgardian edit, and this is the difference between the two..

Asgardian is under editing restrictions as per Requests_for_arbitration/Asgardian-Tenebrae, primary of which is being limited to 1 reversion per 7 day period. Asgardian has already used IP addresses to evade this restriction. Verification is needed to see if this pattern of avoidance is continuing. Hiding T 23:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Even if the IP is Asgardian, that is still only one revert in the last 7 days, right? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Dmcdevit·t 00:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * With no discussion on the article talk page which was part of his restriction. Asgardian is subject to an editing restriction for one year. He is limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. Hiding T 00:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Further, Asgardian has made no edits to an article talk page this month, . Hiding T 00:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Then what do you need the RFCU for? :-) He already did objectively violate the remedy. The revert came from the account, not the IP, so it's clear. Dmcdevit·t 01:09, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Only one comment, which may or may not be relevant or even important. ;) Unlike the other IPs he edits from (which appear to be 203.46.189.91, 211.29.188.167, 210.185.73.90, and 165.69.252.7, and possibly others), which seem to be solely used to edit comics articles, and are apparently as he claims only used when his login times out, the IP referenced above appears to be a shared IP because there are edits to many non-comics articles. Regardless, all the edits from that and the other IPs to comics articles all seem to match his standard sort of edits and subjects. BOZ (talk) 02:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Doh! I was thinking it had to be a revert of his own edit, not any revert. Sorry. Hiding T 14:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * - this case is now complete. Can we go for archive, please? - A l is o n  ❤ 00:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Asgardian



 * B
 * (initial edit); (revert 1);  (revert 2);  (revert 3)
 * (initial edit); (revert 1);  (revert 2);  (revert 3)

Asgardian is under editing restrictions as per Requests_for_arbitration/Asgardian-Tenebrae, primary of which is being limited to 1 reversion per 7 day period. This set of edits is from a 24 hour period. The concern is that the use may have, knowingly or not, edited under the IP to avoid the restrictions. Verification is need to see if this is the start of a pattern of avoidance. J Greb (talk) 15:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * - accepting per Arbitration evidence and ...


 * ✅ - A l is o n  ❤ 20:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * blocked the IP anon for 3 weeks, please contact an admin more familiar with the case. -- lucasbfr  talk 21:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I am adding Obsidianblackboard from a separate case. -JodyBtalk 23:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Code letter: B, F
 * Supporting evidence:
 * Code letter: B, F
 * Supporting evidence:

As per the cited edit and the edit history for Obsidianblackboard, it looks like that account was created by Asgardian after that editor was block for violating ArbCom issued restrictions. A check user is need to verify that and help determine if additional sanctions are warranted. J Greb (talk) 22:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

J Greb posted this portion of the request. I merged it with the previous case. -JodyBtalk 23:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ - A l is o n  ❤ 19:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * tagged and blocked. I reset Asgardian's block and logged it. -- lucasbfr  talk 15:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''