Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Azizbekov

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Azizbekov 2



 * Code letter: F.

This is an obvious sock account, that made his very first contribution by reverting quite an obscure article, previously edited by another sock of this banned user. --Grandmaster 04:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

I added another 2 new accounts, obvious socks. Grandmaster 05:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Also, one of the accounts listed User:Urmenihte, in its one-day-long history of editing, only made a revert of the Sumgait pogrom inserting back YouTube videos, which violate copyright policy. Note the page was just recently edited by banned User:Hu1lee, a sock of User:Azizbekov, which vandalized a number of pages. So I added User:Hu1lee to the list for checkuser as well. Thanks. Atabek 09:46, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


 * User:Urmenihte, User:Deutschie and User:Lobefan24 were identified by checkuser as sockpuppets of banned User:Artaxiad. Atabek 10:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * . All accounts blocked. --Deskana (talky) 21:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Azizbekov





 * Code letter: F.

Andranikpasha is clearly not a new editor and has a good knowledge of wikiediting. He edits Armenia - Azerbaijan related articles in an aggressive style similar to the banned users Azizbekov and Fadix (these 2 could also be related to each other). Hu1lee is also a suspicious account editing the same pages in tandem with Andranikpasha. Urgent investigation is required. Grandmaster 10:52, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


 * None of those editors are Fadix, for the simple reason that I am Fadix. Anatolmethanol and Fadix and this account share the same static IP and I have no interest toying with open proxies. Neither Azizbekov, neither Andranikpasha nor Hu1lee are me, beside after checking their contributions one can see they make mistakes which I would not have done. I would have never created a shushi massacre article because it was part of the Ottoman invasionist campaign after the first world war and I would have covered this in a more general article(Ottoman excurtions in the East). I would not have added some of the basic mistakes in the Azeri SS article which were introduced by Azizbekov. Keep it up with your accusations behind my back even when I'm banned. This account can now be banned since its purpouses was to fix an article and it did it partly. Here stops my disruption. And Grandmaster don't worry, if I use a sock, you won't need to request any checkuser you could only ask the person who you suspect and if it is me, I won't be a coward, I will just admit it. Anyway, Bye. Drosophilawhodoestnotfly 16:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


 * please provide a link to the block log of the original account. -- lucasbfr talk 16:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Here's the link to the block log of :, and this is the block log of : . Fadix, if the above accounts have nothing to do with you, checkuser will help to clear you from suspicions, so it is in your interest to have it performed. Grandmaster 04:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * What disturbs me most is that you could even believe that Azizbekov is me(the guy has made some very basic mistakes in his edits). I have requested a checkusers to Thatcher by mail to settle the issue when I was accused, but this won't confirm anything unless those editors are editing proxy-free so that any comparaison by checkuser could have any validity. Because we both know that even if checkusers say unrelated this will never discard the possibility that it could have been me. But you will have to explain how a merger like me could have created articles like Shushi massacre or edited ASALA in a glorifying fashion or contributed in Azeri SS, when knowing my behavior you would have known that the first thing I would have done is to request the merging of all those articles (Georgian, Armenian, Azeri SS etc.). You knew my editing history and the way I edited for two years, and those editors have nothing Fadiish. Accusing banned users while they can't defend themselves without valid reasons isen't really a good thing to do. Drosophilawhodoestnotfly 05:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The use of a sock account by you made many people suspicious. It was not a nice thing to do, me and other users were thinking that they were dealing with a new user, but it turned out that it was you under the disguise. Now we need to check this couple of suspicious new accounts, if it is not you, you have nothing to worry about. But it us definitely someone previously banned from Wikipedia, he is very well familiar with wikiediting for newbie. Grandmaster 06:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * This is interesting, we have an admitted sock User:Drosophilawhodoestnotfly of User:Fadix posting freely on RfC page and saying he is User:Fadix right above. Added the sock to the list, notice in his contributions, he has edited a number of articles in recent days. Thanks. Atabek 23:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: I confirm Azizbekov being me as I was not a sock originally, and was blocked for the harassment by Grandmaster and his fellow members atabek/parishan etc. --Hu1lee 22:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Now that we have 2 self-admitted socks here, we need to check if has any connection with those accounts. Grandmaster 09:43, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * ❌ --Deskana (talky) 16:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''