Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Bentheadvocate

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Bentheadvocate



 * Code letter: F (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Magnonimous)
 * Supporting evidence: Disruption on Coral calcium (Magnonimous's article of choice), account created day after Magnonimous was indefed. PouponOnToast (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * See also Requests for checkuser/Case/Magnonimous
 * I'm not seeing specific disruption on the mentioned article. Here's a diff of all his edits. I note there not been much/any reversion done and his edits have all be just two sessions. Magnonimous' edits seem to be very different - A l is o n  ❤ 17:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * And the account timing, the obvious linguistic tics - the no overlapping edits, and the median edit times? PouponOnToast (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Firstly, provide the evidence please and remember that . Also, I note that there are no overlapping edits because Bentheadvocate began editing six weeks after Magnonimous and socks had stopped. Have you thought about opening a SSP case first? - A l is o n  ❤ 18:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * By six weeks you mean 22 hours after the ban on Magnonimous was entered? . It's ok - I mean, I didn't find the time to put a tracking cookie in an email to him and then start a million threads around the internet, so he can just go right on harassing people. PouponOnToast (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Gratuitous WordBomb reference aside, I was referring to the last edits being six week before - A l is o n  ❤ 20:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * By six weeks you mean 22 hours after the ban on Magnonimous was entered? . It's ok - I mean, I didn't find the time to put a tracking cookie in an email to him and then start a million threads around the internet, so he can just go right on harassing people. PouponOnToast (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Gratuitous WordBomb reference aside, I was referring to the last edits being six week before - A l is o n  ❤ 20:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 *  Thank You  Alison. -- BE  TA  20:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * another checkuser for second opinion re. case - A l is o n  ❤ 20:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Alison, are you asking for a second opinion on whether to run the check or on the results? Thatcher 16:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Emailing ... - A l is o n  ❤ 17:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Unnecessary - dropping my request PouponOnToast (talk) 09:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''