Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Billy Ego

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Cold Porcelain



 * Code letter: G


 * Special:Contributions/Cold_Porcelain Perhaps related to Billy Ego or another banned editor


 * Supporting evidence:

In the past, when there has been a dispute on one of several related pages including Fascism, Nazism, and Neo-Nazism, new single issue Wiki editors suddenly appear, edit for a time, and then vanish. Based on demeanor and content, it is possible that some new editors may be violating Wiki policies such as evading bans.

See: for example, these past incidents:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Forrest_Johnson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ron_Pistol Cberlet (talk) 00:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This case combines two cases filed simultaneously. -JodyBtalk 22:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * -, as there is insufficient evidence provided to take a case here - A l is o n  ❤ 23:09, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅. User:Cold Porcelain is a sockpuppet of banned editor User:Aiemeus, who in turn is a suspected sockpuppet of User:Billy Ego. Jayjg (talk) 03:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Blocked ; I will look at a bit more closely since the account looks to be a likely match for Billy Ego on the basis of on-wiki evidence. MastCell Talk 19:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Billy Ego

 * (see archive for associated socks)
 * (see archive for associated socks)

Code letter: F (block log)

Supporting Evidence


 * 


 * 


 * 


 * 


 * 

Based on a thorough review of related discussion posts and edits; the topics, issues POV, and demeanor of recent editors by Cold_Porcelain; and previous interactions with Billy Ego; I believe it is appropriate to request a check user.

In the past, when there has been a dispute on one of several related pages including Fascism, Nazism, and Neo-Nazism, new single issue Wiki editors suddenly appear, edit for a time, and then vanish. Over time, there have been repeated incidents where a group of like-minded libertarian and/or anarcho capitalist editors have arrived on Wikipedia, and edited in concert to promote marginal viewpoints in a way that unbalances articles. This is an ongoing problem involving sockpuppets and meatpuppets.

See: for example, these past incidents:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Forrest_Johnson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Ron_Pistol Cberlet (talk) 17:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: Billy Ego is undoubtedly stale, and I believe most of his socks are as well. ==  are the last couple of Billy Ego socks to be identified, and probably the only ones recent enough to run. To be clear, Aiemeus and Smockroker were checkuser-confirmed as socks of each other by User:Alison; I am 99+% certain that both are socks of Billy Ego based on on-wiki evidence and quirks, but they could not be checked against Billy or his known socks due to staleness. Billy is fairly adept at evading checkuser, and he certainly tries very hard, so it might be worth touching base with Alison, who ran the most recent check on Aiemeus/Smockroker, regarding some of the technical details. Just a suggestion. FWIW, the contrib pattern and overall style of Cold Porcelain is a decent match for Billy Ego. MastCell Talk 17:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

See above, merged from Requests for checkuser/Case/Cold Porcelain. Thatcher 10:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Billy Ego (9)

 * (see archive for associated socks)

Code letter: F (block log)

Billy's been quiet for awhile, given his prolific sockpuppeteering in the past. However, this new account matches his pet issues and POV, and targets articles he's gone after with his sock account et al. Please double-check against available IP data. Thanks. MastCell Talk 22:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

, nothing to check against. Sorry. Thatcher 04:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks for looking anyhow. MastCell Talk 05:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Billy Ego (8)


Latest brand-new account to revert to Billy Ego's preferred version of Criticism of the FDA.

He's gotten more proficient at evading checkuser, so if could be repeated as well (see archived Billy Ego requests) it might be useful - Operation Spooner is fairly new and has taken up the exact POV/arguments on anarcho-capitalism that Billy's socks have historically advanced. I'm pretty confident at spotting Billy Ego socks, and this one has all the hallmarks. MastCell Talk 16:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

It's that Kentosi is a sockpuppet of Billy Ego. Mackensen (talk) 00:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Billy Ego (7)


Code letter: B

OS has inserted sources  which have been previously deleted from Anarchism for being not significant enough for inclusion. Whilst these edits are not too bad POV-wise, it seems to me very strange why a new user should so coincidentally pick these two sources to be cited. I'd like an RFCU check just for assurance.

Also, it's been a long time since the last batch of sockpuppets have shown up, and even is OS isn't a sock, the RFCU may catch others. -- infinity  0  18:54, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

--jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 19:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Billy Ego (6)

 * - most recent confirmed socks, such as, listed here.

Code letter: B

New accounts, shortly after the last batch was blocked, jump right into Billy's pet topics with his POV and style. MastCell Talk 22:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)


 * ✅. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 22:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Billy Ego (5)


Code letter: B

New batch of suspicious accounts, showing familiarity with Wikipedia and jumping in to the usual libertarian-related topics. Past experience indicates there may be more sleeper accounts as well. MastCell Talk 16:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * ❌ No IP relationship detected. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 19:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Note that a subsequent checkuser, conducted by Dmcdevit, confirmed that Illegal editor is a Billy Ego sockpuppet. MastCell Talk 18:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Billy Ego (4)
Code letter: B

New account, same old POV (hairsplitting on libertarianism, Milton Friedman worship, etc). MastCell Talk 07:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 15:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Billy Ego (3)





 * Code letter: B - Requests for arbitration/Billy Ego-Sandstein

First edit was to revert POV-correcting edits made by multiple users to Anarchism, just like previous sockpuppets of this user have been doing. -- infinity  0  11:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * . A published open proxy. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 15:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Billy Ego (2)





 * Code letter: B

User began their wikipedia account by going straight into a deep debate on the article at Benjamin Tucker, a non-major figure. It is possible they are a sockpuppet, maybe not, but if he/she is, then it is better to ban sooner rather than later. -- infinity  0  15:39, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Code B is for evasion of ban by ArbCom and requires "link to closed case". Please supply link for a compliant request.VK35  15:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The link is archived below, but here it is: Requests for arbitration/Billy Ego-Sandstein. I realize the initial request above sounds a little like fishing, but let me add that as someone who's dealt with a number of Billy Ego sockpuppets, I think there's a strong likelihood, based on the editing patterns, that this is one of them. I'd encourage the checkuser request to be processed, both to confirm it and because previous checkusers have had the side benefit of turning up a number of other sleeper accounts of this banned user. MastCell Talk 15:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅. Also:
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * clerks -- don't bother with demanding links to "make compliant" on continued requests such as this; as soon as you see the name "Billy Ego" or "JB196", for example, you should know it's an ongoing issue. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks all. The accounts have been blocked. Till next time. MastCell Talk 17:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Billy Ego (1)





 * Code letter: B

Seeing the Contributions page of Crashola reveals fanatical POV pushing from a supposedly newbie account, adding in extreme POV on multiple anarchism-related articles which has had to been cleaned up by many editors. Possible sockpuppet of User:RJII or User:Anarcho-capitalism. Someone please investigate further. -- infinity  0  20:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅. A fuller list to inspect:
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 23:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I trust that all of these will be blocked and edits made under these accounts reverted? -- infinity  0  23:35, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Relevant arbitration case: Requests for arbitration/Billy Ego-Sandstein. -- infinity  0  23:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * (Conversation removed). You'll need to get someone to do the blocking on your own; see above where it says In most cases, any block or other action based on the outcome will not be taken by the checkuser-people or the clerks.. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 00:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * How about my 300 other sockpuppets that have been operating for 4 years? Crashola 00:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * If you believe everyone from the same ISP is a sockpuppet I have a bridge to sell you. Crashola 00:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * All apparently operating out of your living room. That's one hell of a bridge you've got there. Mackensen (talk) 01:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Please note that I have extended the block on User:Billy Ego (the main account) from one year to an idef block. ——  Eagle 101 Need help? 01:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * And I have blocked all 17 sockpuppets. Picaroon (Talk) 01:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I'd like to add an additional request: Code letter: B, as above.

POV-pushing from the now-familiar anarcho-capitalist viewpoint, increased activity after the above socks were blocked. When User:Anarcho-capitalism was blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Billy Ego, Vision Thing immediately moved the sockpuppet's "Anarcho-Capitalism for Dummies" manifesto in their own userspace. MastCell Talk 20:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * per user request -- lucasbfr talk 21:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)


 * ❌.  Voice -of- All  22:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * See Requests for checkuser/Case/Vision Thing. Interesting that this comes up again... --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 00:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''