Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Blake The Third

''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it .''

Blake The Third



 * G:

All the same. You find the proof. Herei s why. I want to confess all I have done wrong. i hope by doing this I can prove to all of you who I am and that I'll be shown to be an honest person. --Really Sick Man (talk) 21:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Really Sick Man (talk • contribs) 00:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Original request was malformed; I've fixed it up as best I can, attempting to build a list of mentioned users and removing accounts which don't exist, based on the original version. Submitting user is a very new account. – Luna Santin  (talk) 02:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Really Sick Man, could you explain why you believe the listed accounts are all being used by the same person? You must provide sufficient reasoning if you want this request handled. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 15:50, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Why do you exactly want a CheckUser conducted on yourself? Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * One of the accounts that didn't exist was "Jeway"; there is an account, blocked on 25 July as a sockpuppet of The Great Editor In Chief. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 22:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * - this is all about a sockpuppeteer who wants trophy accounts gathered under the one username. I recognize one or two accounts above, which I will check. All of the abovementioned accounts are abusive socks and can be blocked as such. I'll see the others are blocked, too as well as certain IPs - A l is o n  ❤ 06:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Also add a few soft rangeblocks to that - A l is o n  ❤ 07:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * All accounts indef blocked prior to this RFCU. Tiptoety  talk 17:17, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.''